Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is the western world moving in a far-right direction?

I think that it is, slowly away. In my time, I've seen radical parties and radical ideas normalised along with conspiracy theories. Large minorities of people support these ideas and it's become normalised for people (and politicians) in the middle. The Overton window always changes and it's clear which way it is going.

This is about Trump, but it's not just about him because Europe has had a resurgence of 'nationalist' parties who are losing their taboo and becoming slowly more influential. The British Conservative Party is not far-right and is not as radical as - say - the US Republicans or the German AFD. However, they've recently instituted measures that effectively criminalise asylum seekers. The Tories want to send them to Rwanda to be processed. They also passed a public order bill which means you can get locked up for 'disruption.' Most protest causes some kind of disruption and that is half of the point. Here, UKIP and the Brexit Party acted as outliers to push the Tories in a more nativist direction. Obviously, they still have the same neoliberal policies that benefit the rich. Blame someone else and people will vote for you nonetheless.

In continental Europe (where most countries have proportional representation voting) radical right parties have emerged and become more popular. In some cases, they have served in Government either on a local or regional level. In Italy, Hungary and Poland, they have led governments. Trump has taken over the US Republican Party to the point where other candidates are terrified to say they won't support him if he goes to jail for insighting an insurrection. Hungary is the place where the far right has had the most success. If you have time, this is an excellent article:

https://www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/en/content/politics-worst-practices-hungary-2010s

Why is this happening? My take on this is because Western economies are now in a period of long-term low (or zero) growth. The neoliberal era (from the 80s to the 00s) saw rapid growth over a long period of time. However, much of this was created debt accumulation and the financialization of our economies, which also entrenched greater instability. It also disproportionately effected some groups more than others. This came to a head with the 2007/08 financial crash. That incident really was a bookmark in modern political history and it didn't come about [i]just [/i]because of greedy bankers but because the growth models of our economies were unsustainable. After the recession, we had some periods of slow growth before Covid. Since the Covid crash, whatever growth we have had has been eaten by inflation. The days of long-term economic growth are probably gone for good in the west and people can feel it. A big part of this is indeed down to globalisation.

When the economics change, so does the politics, even if there is usually a lag. More people are open to question whether the conventional politics of the last fifty years represent them amd are more open to alternatives. The left has had its own alternative candidates and answers: Corbyn, Sanders, Syriza and others. Outside France (where Jean-Luc Melenchon is a major figure) this has mostly been defeated. So politics in most places has the liberal centre holding onto the status quo against an increasingly radicalised right wing. In many cases, these centrists have taken on more right-wing politics to try and get elected. I'm thinking of Macron and Keir Starmer in particular. Change can happen from within as well as without. The change that gets the most support (regardless of whether their solutions will improve people's lives) is coming from the right. I hope I am wrong but this process is set to continue.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
beckyromero · 36-40, F
As for the U.S., I think we are not so much moving towards a far-right direction as a more autocractic direction.

There are many ideas that the far left has come up with that are also an antithesis to freedom. Some seemingly insignificant, others much more serious. Whether it be how many times you can fly on an airplane in a year, whether you can get a free refill of pop at the restaurant or if the restaurant can give away a toy with certain meals purchased for childen, proposed city traffic tolls at certain hours (congestion tolling), etc.

But as far as Trump, the MAGA movement is a shrinking minority. But a very vocal shrinking minority. They are like a rabid animal that is cornered. So one needs to be careful in dealing with it and not let it escape or bite you.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@beckyromero [quote]There are many ideas that the far left has come up with that are also an antithesis to freedom.[/quote]

As a Neville Chamberian fanboy, I have to agree.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@beckyromero That was joke.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Burnley123

We have a Neville running for the GOP nomination.

Vivek Ramaswamy

Actually, Ramaswamy is such an appeaser he makes Neville look like Winston.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@beckyromero I'm not a fan of either tbh.

Calling me Neville annoyed me because Chamberlain was a Tory. So was Churchill but hey.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Burnley123

Well, Stanley Baldwin is the one who left Chamberlain holding the bag as far as Britain's unpreparedness for war.

But he somehow escapes the appeasement tag, at least in modern accounts.

Chamberlain knew war was coming and was trying to bide time. His problem was that the more time he "bought" with appeasement allowed Germany to get even stronger. Supporting going to war to protect Czechoslovakia in 1938 might have led to Hitler's downfall and a Germany defeat since it would have bogged down many Germany divisions in Czechoslovakia, denied the Germans the Škoda Works intact and pushed the execution of Fall Weiß) well past September 1939.

One of these days I will get around to reading "Guilty Men."
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@beckyromero Or read Wages of Destruction by Adam Tooze, which is about the economy of the Third Reich. Nobody was prepared for war in 1938, but Germany especially and they needed that year, I'm not disputing the history of that, just its relevance to ALL other wars.