Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is the western world moving in a far-right direction?

I think that it is, slowly away. In my time, I've seen radical parties and radical ideas normalised along with conspiracy theories. Large minorities of people support these ideas and it's become normalised for people (and politicians) in the middle. The Overton window always changes and it's clear which way it is going.

This is about Trump, but it's not just about him because Europe has had a resurgence of 'nationalist' parties who are losing their taboo and becoming slowly more influential. The British Conservative Party is not far-right and is not as radical as - say - the US Republicans or the German AFD. However, they've recently instituted measures that effectively criminalise asylum seekers. The Tories want to send them to Rwanda to be processed. They also passed a public order bill which means you can get locked up for 'disruption.' Most protest causes some kind of disruption and that is half of the point. Here, UKIP and the Brexit Party acted as outliers to push the Tories in a more nativist direction. Obviously, they still have the same neoliberal policies that benefit the rich. Blame someone else and people will vote for you nonetheless.

In continental Europe (where most countries have proportional representation voting) radical right parties have emerged and become more popular. In some cases, they have served in Government either on a local or regional level. In Italy, Hungary and Poland, they have led governments. Trump has taken over the US Republican Party to the point where other candidates are terrified to say they won't support him if he goes to jail for insighting an insurrection. Hungary is the place where the far right has had the most success. If you have time, this is an excellent article:

https://www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/en/content/politics-worst-practices-hungary-2010s

Why is this happening? My take on this is because Western economies are now in a period of long-term low (or zero) growth. The neoliberal era (from the 80s to the 00s) saw rapid growth over a long period of time. However, much of this was created debt accumulation and the financialization of our economies, which also entrenched greater instability. It also disproportionately effected some groups more than others. This came to a head with the 2007/08 financial crash. That incident really was a bookmark in modern political history and it didn't come about [i]just [/i]because of greedy bankers but because the growth models of our economies were unsustainable. After the recession, we had some periods of slow growth before Covid. Since the Covid crash, whatever growth we have had has been eaten by inflation. The days of long-term economic growth are probably gone for good in the west and people can feel it. A big part of this is indeed down to globalisation.

When the economics change, so does the politics, even if there is usually a lag. More people are open to question whether the conventional politics of the last fifty years represent them amd are more open to alternatives. The left has had its own alternative candidates and answers: Corbyn, Sanders, Syriza and others. Outside France (where Jean-Luc Melenchon is a major figure) this has mostly been defeated. So politics in most places has the liberal centre holding onto the status quo against an increasingly radicalised right wing. In many cases, these centrists have taken on more right-wing politics to try and get elected. I'm thinking of Macron and Keir Starmer in particular. Change can happen from within as well as without. The change that gets the most support (regardless of whether their solutions will improve people's lives) is coming from the right. I hope I am wrong but this process is set to continue.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
helenS · 36-40, F
About 20% of the population of EVERY country [u]adore[/u] serfdom and an authoritarian government. There's not much you can do about [u]that[/u]. Every republic has to live with it.
Big problems arise only when the authoritarians are able to form a coalition with "conservative" parties, or hijack a conservative party.
devonman · 61-69, M
@helenS In the UK , I am concerned about the strong feelings against “ illegal migration “ , being stoked up the right wing press and on social media.
.This appears to be the most important priority among a large swathe of the population .
MartinII · 70-79, M
@helenS Surely authoritarianism is to be found more on the left than on the right nowadays.
helenS · 36-40, F
@MartinII The authoritarian personality is independent of that person's left or right-wing leanings [English?]
MartinII · 70-79, M
@helenS That’s a very interesting question. I think you are probably right, and the other side of that coin is that authoritarianism is to be found at both ends of the political spectrum, to different extents at different times.

When I studied the subject in the early 1970s, authoritarian personality traits were routinely associated with right-wing politics. That seemed fair enough at the time, when memories of Nazism and fascism were still relatively fresh, and some small neo-fascist parties were active. Also, centre-right parties were generally more authoritarian in their politics than centre-left ones. For example, you were much more likely to find supporters of capital punishment in the British Conservative Party than in the Labour Party. At the same time there was increasing acknowledgment that Soviet Communism also exhibited authoritarian characteristics.

Now, in the UK, we have a very different situation. The dominant left-wing ideology puports to be liberal, and yet is intolerant of opposition. These self-styled liberals preach “diversity” and “inclusion”, talk the language of “rights”, challenge conventional ideas about sexual orientation and family organisation, deplore what they see as authoritarian behaviour in our histoory. And yet they argue that everyone should follow their beliefs and that anyone who fails to do so should be “cancelled” - surely an authoritarian trait. Admittedly this form of authoritarianism is relatively benign compared with some historical precedents - non-believers are to be ostracised, not sent to concentration camps. But at the same time there are much stronger libertarian tendencies on the right than on the left. And there are even some signs of authoritarian thinking in the mainstream centre: adherents of orthodox policy on climate change and the authoritarian response to covid have argued, apparently in all seriousness, that dissenters should be silenced, and those dissenters tend to be on the right. That is why I assert that, at the moment, authoritarianism is to be found more on the left than on the right. Who knows what the psychological explanation for this is.