Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Resolution to Censure Schiff Returns to House with a Crucial Tweak

The House motion to censure Rep. Adam Schiff just got a second chance.


A week ago, the California Democrat dodged receiving a public rebuke from his colleagues because a score of Republicans voted with Democrats to table the resolution, but now the wannabe senator from Southern California is going to face judgment again.

And with the numbers adding up against him, it couldn’t happen to a nastier guy.

Schiff is the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee who spent most of 2017 to 2020 repeatedly abusing his position to lie to the American people about supposed evidence in the “Russia collusion” hoax against then-President Donald Trump.

His reputation, and record, of dishonesty were so established that when Republicans took over the House after the 2022 midterms, one of the first things new House Speaker Kevin McCarthy did was strip Schiff of even being a member of the committee he once chaired. (McCarthy also kicked Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell off the Intelligence Committee, but there were some other … more exotic reasons for that.)

Last week, a resolution to censure Schiff was tabled on a vote of 225 to 196, with seven members abstaining.

According to the House roll call, the vote on tabling the motion included 20 Republicans in support, two who voted “present” and three who didn’t vote. If all the Republicans who either supported the motion to table the resolution, voted “present” or cast a vote to support the resolution in a new form, it would pass the House with a 221-vote majority, more than 50 percent of the House’s 435 seats

And pass it might.

For most of the Republicans who voted to table the resolution, the sticking point was that the language of the resolution text included fining Schiff $16 million, or half the estimated cost of the special counsel investigation into the “Russia collusion” hoax.

The Washington Times reported Monday that the resolution’s sponsor, Florida Republican Anna Paulina Luna, is planning to introduce the resolution again without the fine.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
trollslayer · 46-50, M
THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING THE USA TODAY!
DavidT8899 · 22-25, M
@trollslayer Maybe not,but it's one that should be addressed.Blatant lying and abuse of power needs to be punished.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@DavidT8899 Agreed. That is why Trump was indicted.
DavidT8899 · 22-25, M
@trollslayer No,he was indicted as a means of "getting him off the board";when Bill Clinton refused to part with classified documents after the end of his last term,the case was taken to the Supreme Court and it was ruled that the President -even an outgoing one-has the sole and unilateral power to make that determination.I suppose that changes when the Presidents name is Trump.Go figure.And remember the joke that the Russiagate "investigation"was revealed to be,as well as the mountain of what appears to be very real evidence of Joe Biden accepted bribes for favors that is still being slow-walked by the F.B.I and ignored by the mainstream media.And I point this out as someone who hopes that Trump doesn't win the Republican nomination.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@DavidT8899 https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/jun/12/why-the-bill-clinton-sock-drawer-case-is-not-compa/. The rest of your claims are not worth bothering with.