Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Resolution to Censure Schiff Returns to House with a Crucial Tweak

The House motion to censure Rep. Adam Schiff just got a second chance.


A week ago, the California Democrat dodged receiving a public rebuke from his colleagues because a score of Republicans voted with Democrats to table the resolution, but now the wannabe senator from Southern California is going to face judgment again.

And with the numbers adding up against him, it couldn’t happen to a nastier guy.

Schiff is the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee who spent most of 2017 to 2020 repeatedly abusing his position to lie to the American people about supposed evidence in the “Russia collusion” hoax against then-President Donald Trump.

His reputation, and record, of dishonesty were so established that when Republicans took over the House after the 2022 midterms, one of the first things new House Speaker Kevin McCarthy did was strip Schiff of even being a member of the committee he once chaired. (McCarthy also kicked Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell off the Intelligence Committee, but there were some other … more exotic reasons for that.)

Last week, a resolution to censure Schiff was tabled on a vote of 225 to 196, with seven members abstaining.

According to the House roll call, the vote on tabling the motion included 20 Republicans in support, two who voted “present” and three who didn’t vote. If all the Republicans who either supported the motion to table the resolution, voted “present” or cast a vote to support the resolution in a new form, it would pass the House with a 221-vote majority, more than 50 percent of the House’s 435 seats

And pass it might.

For most of the Republicans who voted to table the resolution, the sticking point was that the language of the resolution text included fining Schiff $16 million, or half the estimated cost of the special counsel investigation into the “Russia collusion” hoax.

The Washington Times reported Monday that the resolution’s sponsor, Florida Republican Anna Paulina Luna, is planning to introduce the resolution again without the fine.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
That's a huge fine and I'm sure the movers' point can be made without it.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@MistyCee

Yes, of course, Misty; it would set a bad precedent.

There's hardly a member of Congress that hasn't become a multi-millionaire, and they naturally want to protect their fortunes.
@Thinkerbell
Wasn’t trump’s rape libel suit 6 million compared to the 14 million some butthurt republicans are going for.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@SomeLikeItHot

Apples and oranges.

The Schiff case is an internal House matter, not a law suit in court.

Besides, Schiff's fine is off the table because 20 Republicans didn't go along with it.
@Thinkerbell
Should be a law against harassing a rep doing a legitimate process to keep our country free of criminal activity.
DavidT8899 · 22-25, M
@SomeLikeItHot And laws against a rep telling multiple blatant lies to his fellow congressmen and the American people.....oh,wait,THERE IS!Schiff will be lucky if he gets only a censure.Personally,Id expel him.
@DavidT8899
Have you ever voted in an election yet?
Schiff has not lied and was definitely needed to keep an out of control deplorable maga riot in check!
DavidT8899 · 22-25, M
@SomeLikeItHot Whether I have voted in an election is immaterial to being able to see basic truth.Schiff did NOTHING BUT lie during his time on that committee!
@DavidT8899
Baby deplorables growing up.
is there anything more outright frightening?
DavidT8899 · 22-25, M
@SomeLikeItHot For one thing,people such as yourself.But at any rate,let's end this here.Ive wasted enough time with the likes of you.