Should Charles become king?

Will he swear to protect the freedoms and liberties of the people, or will he side with the elite?

"For, on June 3rd 2020, the King, as the then Prince of Wales, helped to launch publicly the World Economic Forum’s ‘Great Reset’. This is the brainchild of Klaus Schwab who set up this privately run global think-tank that recruits the world’s wealthiest entrepreneurs and technocrats whilst grooming and placing his ‘Young Global Leaders’ to influence the world’s political channels. Meeting annually in Davos and elsewhere, these unelected and unaccountable ‘visionaries of the future’ purport to direct the lives of all the peoples of the world.

Working alongside the privately controlled and usury-practising central banking system led by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the World Economic Forum (WEF) is now overseeing extreme social engineering to hollow out sovereign nations from within in order to bring them to the point of complete moral collapse and meek compliance, especially when it comes to sowing the seeds of deliberate confusion and doubt in young minds. This all has the potential to take humanity towards a very dark place indeed, involving complete digital enslavement and the physical lockdown of entire communities and countries.

At the same time, ‘bad science’, to quote the late and sorely-missed Professor David Bellamy, is being hyped up by multi-billionaire-funded universities to justify this ‘Great Reset’. They are using bogus ‘climate change’ modelling to take us towards a Net Zero carbon-free economy where we will experience complete state control over our everyday lives involving among other things, their planned ’15 minute cities’. Any proper scientific debate has been deliberately shut down by the mainstream media and people are not being told that CO2, which accounts for only 0.04% of the Earth’s atmosphere, is in fact the ‘Gas of Life’. Real science actually says that we need more CO2 not less!

Our freedoms will be further put in jeopardy by the myriad of digital traps that are currently being laid: for example, the ‘internet of things’, the ‘internet of bodies’ and ‘transhumanism’—that is the physical linking of the
human body to the digital world. It is proposed that we will have Digital IDs and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) which will be combined with invasive and detailed Social Credit Schemes that use advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI). Whether in our home, on the streets or in our workplace we will all be monitored on a daily basis by the state using SMART 5G/6G technologies and advanced facial recognition software.
Our capacity to make independent decisions for ourselves, including the right to travel, will be diminished considerably, if not altogether. Our ability to spend our state-provided digital money or tokens in an otherwise
cashless society will be determined by our ‘carbon footprint’ and our loyalty, acceptance and ‘good behaviour’ towards the ‘state’ and what it now stands for. Everything that George Orwell warned us about is now starting to happen."

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ArishMell · 70-79, M

Whoever wrote that passage seems to have a motive for having done so, who was it and what is his or her motive?

The writer is clearly a climate-change denier, and whilst one might still argue to what extent human activities are influencing that, few seriously deny the climate is changing in ways we have not seen before at a rate not seen before.

We will all be monitored via our portable telephones and by cameras? Really? Best not use our 'phones for anything illegal. Best not try shop-lifting then. As if government agencies have even the man-power let alone will to carry out such things - though they do try it in China, Russia and North Korea, perhaps.

Besides, many people already have no qualms at all about being watched by the giant American corporations who have taken over the Internet; for purely commercial terms. I do of course take it the "F" household does not use Facebook and does not own a so-called "smart-speaker" (both of these are eavesdroppers for the advertising trade). Well, I don't use Facebook and refuse to have a "smart-speaker" either, but it is that American commerce not the UK Government, and certainly not the WEF, I fear.

.

As for the last allegation that the WEF will control our personal lives through State control of our money, I think this bizarre fear stems from banks trying to reign in speculating on the so-far unregulated,, unofficial, fraud-ridden and far from environmentally-friendly parallel-world of so-called digital currency.

There are enthusiasts who say we should not need cash. You see them nearly every day, paying even for a bar of chocolate or a bus fare by some telephone "app" (horrible word) ; but they clearly do not think of the deleterious effects, at least in Britain, on society that being completely cashless would bring. Nothing to do with imagined fears of being watched by Klaus Schwab! Maybe they move in very narrow circles and have yet "to get a life", as they might say.

.
I do worry about so-called AI, which is not genuinely intelligent but is an umbrella term for certain types of computer programmes created by people for definite purposes. At heart, computers are only boxes of transistors and programmes are just flows of electrical pulses; neither is intelligent, but their makers certainly are. The dangers in what I would prefer to call "PI" (Pseudo Intelligence) are what it is used for and by whom; but we can say that of almost everything made; and that which has been invented cannot be "un-invented".

Similarly too, another new development, that of being able to copy real people's speech to create false material. Enabling outright liars to, for example, defraud pop singers, or to destroy politicians' reputations.

WalterF · 70-79, M

@ArishMell The post asks a question, which you have not answered. Instead, you go all round the houses, about the source, the writer, climate deniers, etc.

Yes or no to the question?

ArishMell · 70-79, M

@WalterF All right. I will

Yes.

It's you who quoted all that second-hand, round-the-houses stuff after the question.

WalterF · 70-79, M

@ArishMell Thank you.

Just rewatching series one of The Crown, I am aware more than ever that in terms of selfless service of the people, Charles doesn't -and never will - hold a candle to the stature of his mother.

So for me, I am left unmoved by and indifferent to this man's receiving of a title. Impersonal leadership? What a joke. He is a man of strong opinions, which he will seek to impose, while publishing them loudly. Compare and contrast the late Queen.

ArishMell · 70-79, M

@WalterF Yes, he has long held certain opinions with which you may or may not agree, especially on environmental matters; but while perhaps not of the stature of his mother I think he will still discharge his constitutional duties and responsibilities peoperly.

SW-User

@WalterF you’re rewatching series one of the Crown. Splendid. It’s not a historical documentary, though. You do know that, right?

WalterF · 70-79, M

@SW-User Beware talking down to people, that demeans you in their eyes

Yes, any idiot knows it's not a documentary. Which is why I stopped watching before they got to their flights of fancy with Diana.

Any more supercilious and pointless remarks?

SW-User

@WalterF you were talking about the Crown as if it were fact. Also, if you are

indifferent to this man’s receiving of a title

why did you bother with this post in the first place?

WalterF · 70-79, M

@SW-User Well that seems deafeningly obvious to me. Try: to find out what people think?