@
SlaveEt My take on this is that people in general do things to their advantage, and usually that means occasionally doing things that cross a line (legal or moral) knowing they will likely not face punishment. This could be speeding or lying, or could be hush money payments or blackmail. Generally, the gravity of the transgression is proportional to the importance of the person. In that sense, I fully expect that any politician in any higher office has a few of these transgressions, the gravity of which is dependent upon the lens they are viewed through and the people doing the viewing.
In the case of Trump, I fully expect that he or his lawyers made hush money payments and did so in such a way as to hide the evidence. I expect many other politicians, celebrities, CEOs, athletes and the like have done the same (Clintons, for sure). My feeling is that prosecution in this case should find a way to settle this out of the public eye knowing the door that would be opened should they prosecute a former president for something that probably many others are guilty of. Unfortunately, that is the society we live in, and I am not sure I want to live in a society where every action by everyone is scrutinized. People only care because this is Trump. The problem is, Trump has done many other things, thrown many people under the bus, and generally made enemies. Had he had a relatively "normal" presidency I doubt people would care enough about Stormy Daniels to still be talking about it.
The election interference stuff, however, is an entirely different animal. That crosses a much bolder line.