This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ElRengo · 70-79, M
Bertold Brecht himself was a source of lucid truths
ragnalikessnow · 22-25, F
@ElRengo do I hear irony in that? 🧐😊I actually really like reading his books
ElRengo · 70-79, M
@ragnalikessnow
No irony at all, not from me.
I discovered him more than 50 years ago.
And I still read his works with joy.
No irony at all, not from me.
I discovered him more than 50 years ago.
And I still read his works with joy.

SW-User
@ElRengo I only read them by the light of That Old Bilbao Moon
ElRengo · 70-79, M
@SW-User Interesting
ElRengo · 70-79, M
@RedBaron
Enamoured? Or previously said worship? Not really.
I just find in his works some lucid food for thought. As it happens with other authors and to other readers.
Do I agree with him in everything? No.
In any case I find him better than some others.
What I find funny (cos it doesn´t even qualifies as irony) is to be focused on trivialities.
But of course may be is in those trivia where you find truth to be.......
Enamoured? Or previously said worship? Not really.
I just find in his works some lucid food for thought. As it happens with other authors and to other readers.
Do I agree with him in everything? No.
In any case I find him better than some others.
What I find funny (cos it doesn´t even qualifies as irony) is to be focused on trivialities.
But of course may be is in those trivia where you find truth to be.......
ElRengo · 70-79, M
@RedBaron
Truth is Truth! Ohhhhhhhhhhh......what a deep definition of it!
Names may not be trivial but they become so when the core of the thing is not the name of the one saying something instead on what it may mean.
That is, the name even if important is not relevant. Insisting in it is trivial.
And of course I´m selective.
There are more truths than the ones that apply or matter on what is being said.
Truth is Truth! Ohhhhhhhhhhh......what a deep definition of it!
Names may not be trivial but they become so when the core of the thing is not the name of the one saying something instead on what it may mean.
That is, the name even if important is not relevant. Insisting in it is trivial.
And of course I´m selective.
There are more truths than the ones that apply or matter on what is being said.