SAFE FLYING for the spoilt brats of Davos (to hell with the rest of us)

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Even you, a member of the blinkered covid cathedral worshippers, should be worried by this Great Advocate of enforced gene- altering therapies refusing to get in a plane with a vaccinated pilot

@WalterF So zero evidence or sources to support you insane ravings. Zero surprise there.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Zero? If you were motivated by any desire to hear other points of view than those that have hypnotised you since day one, you would explore the names and the threads mentioned in the post. But no - self-satisfied, smug belief in "The Science" - or rather, the Lies.

@WalterF I am not surprised you can't support any of your claims because that is your MO.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow So you are denying this fact? Prove that it isn't true! Put your money whefe your mouth is! It works both ways. True until proven false. Over to you.

@WalterF Yes because it is made up bullshit and not even you can provide any evidence to support you claim.

I am not the one making insane claims. The burden of proof is on you.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow That's false. The post (which is not all made up by throwing words together and pulling names out of a hat) presents FACTS. You have a name to follow up, you have an interview you can check out. But what do you do?

Nothing.

Just trot out your usual invective.

You haven't even been to those greasy "fact-checkers" that you trust with your life.

What idleness!

Get on and prove it's all lies! I've done my bit - I've brought you a report. It's just not good enough to sit there and say it's wrong. Who are you, that you think that by your word you can annul anything that contradicts your dogma?

Your credibility is going down the pan, fast

@WalterF Facts you very curiously cannot support and expect everyone to just take your word for it.


And the fact you have such vitriol towards fact checking tells me you are dishonest and have something to hide and not a serious person.


Again, you made the ridiculous claims. The burden of proof is on you to support you ridiculous claims.

I am not the one with a massive credibility problem.

Your entire position is "everything I say is true, because I say so and I don't have to prove anything."

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I have no time just now, but later I will take your scurrilous attitude to task.

(By the way, I did not write this post.)

@WalterF So you can't support any of your claims. Got it.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow So on top of all your other mental failings, you are unable to understand simple written English.

Check the meaning of "later". Any good fact-checker dictionary will give you it. Here's an example. "See you later". This can mean, I'll see you at an unspecified time in the future.

If you think that I am going to give up my Sunday to answer your pootling little complaints, you are wrong. A day away from blinded narrative-pushers like you is not a luxury. But now, it's Monday. There is of course work to do. But there will be time to reply to you.

Got that?

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow This is your last chance.

To sum up: you have been sitting there smugly saying that the facts presented in this post are wrong. This is a weak position to be in, from the outset. We understand from it that you consider yourself to be endowed with superpowers - you can dismiss a referenced article as erroneous without doing the slightest research on it yourself. Wow! the power!

I fail to understand how a person who claims to be rational (as you no doubt do) can do this: dismiss a coherent text, WITH REFERENCES INCLUDED, and deem it false.

Here is your chance. I will give you, below, the reference (one that you could easily have followed up yourself). On the page, you can see the interview referenced in the article. And two other short, very revelatory videos, about the WEF and especially about its intellectual spokesman, Noah Yuval Harari.

However, there is a condition. If you fulfill this condition, then you show yourself to be open-minded, ready to consider sources other than the united front given by all mainstream media and almost all social media and internet search engines.

You should take the time necessary to watch these very short clips. After that, if you must, run to your fact-checkers, those who are paid to do your thinking for you. And then, publish your thoughts - which will be listened to.

If you don't bother to study the short clips on the page, then you will show yourself to be closed to all but the propaganda, and for me, further debate will be useless.

Over to you.

https://newspunch.com/wef-hires-unvaccinated-pilots-to-fly-them-into-davos-safety-of-our-members-is-no-1-priority

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Ok, discussion over. You are hopelessly blind to reality. You cannot be bothered to check these facts using your own tiny mind.

You lose by a knockout. Zero points scored by you. An appalling performance. Sad.

@WalterF So got it. You cannot support any of your conspiracy theory claims. You have no facts or evidence of any kind. Got it.


It is funny how you say all these things just based exclusively on feelings and your own beliefs with nothing to support any of it.

I am not the blind one.


You claimed once you were previously a man of science. That just makes all of this more pathetic. You either have sold out everything you once valued or you sold out and just a grifter. Either option is pretty shit.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow ARE YOU MAD?

THIS IS JUST INCREDIBLE.

I'VE JUST REPEATED FOR YOU THE FULL REFERENCES GIVEN IN THE POST.

YOU HAVEN'T BOTHERED EVEN GLANCING AT THEM!

YOU ARE BEYOND HOPE, CHUM.

Nonetheless, I will stop shouting in frustration, and calmly wish you all the best

@WalterF All you provided was a link to a conspiracy theory website also with no sources of any kind.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I would have thought that videos, clearly taken from a TV program and from WEF talks, were not conspiracy items. Unless these were conspiracy actors. (Did you check to see if there is a pilot by that name? No you didn't.)

Yet another failed argument from you. Keep commenting - you're digging your own intellectual grave.

@WalterF Nothing you have provided is evidence of anything. Just random videos of conspiracy theorists using their own conspiracies as evidence.


You claim to have a background in science. If that is true there are only two possible conclusions. You have thrown out everything you were taught and abandoned science and critical thinking entirely or you are just another grifter pushing a con.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow You are repeating yourself now. You've got nothing. Goodnight