James Webb space telescope finds secret Biden docs - SCATTERED ON THE MOON!!!.

[b]James Webb space telescope finds secret Biden docs - SCATTERED ON THE MOON!!!.[/b]

No . . not really. I just made that up. But you can'tt rule it out. It COULD happen.

Today I want to give props to the pundit who got their "top secret doc" theory linked on Drudge. The theory that sez “Biden's staff secretly trying to force him out by deliberately flubbing the doc revelations”.

This is totally brilliant. I wish I had written it myself. And certainly true, up to a point.

“Biden's staff” of course is NOT a monolithic army of 30 somethings wearing “Biden 2024” tee shirts and blowing kazoos like kids on a sugar high at a birthday party. Some of them are positioning themselves strategically, and have more flexible alliances. Like possibly for Newsom. Kamala in 2024. Kamala (Apocalypse) now. Former Clinton foundation flunkies. AOC believers. White House dog "Major" certainly has his supporters among the staff, too.

It probably the “Kamala now" brigade that's intentionally bungling their wildfire control jobs. How else can you explain doc cache's four, five, and six?

I have to admit here that I've stopped counting. So has the white house. Yesterday's announcement (on Martin Luther King Day) was the belated discovery of “more pages”. At a Biden private residence.

"Cute as a Kewpie doll" White House press secretary Karine Pierre-Smith DID NOT deliver the following disclaimer: “J[i]ust 5 more pages – this time. Yes (sighs) we ARE still looking. These new ones were also marked top secret, but they actually weren't, No . . I don't have to tell you what the doc titles were. You just have to believe me. These are simply among the thousands of government docs every day which are marked top secret, but only because they contain the names of political operatives who are doing things the public shouldn't find out about. Today's docs had no more stuff about Russia, Iran, Ukraine, China. I swear to God. Oh geez .. I need a drink . .. you can't pay me enough to keep doing this!"[/i]

Have you heard the rumor that Karine Jean-Pierre is leaving her job as Press Secretary? For pete's sake – it's only been one year. Google it – her resignation is an actual rumor. The rats are fleeing the sinking ship. The White House Easter Bunny is probably next. That costumed staffer who pulled Biden away from the cameras during an "egg roll" on the south lawn.

Back to the James Webb space telescope. If I was press secretary for a day, I'd know how to put an end to this dumpster fire. Using over the top humor: [i]“We want to confirm – the ginormous webb space telescope has examined EVERY INCH of the moon in detail. No secret docs found blowing in the wind. Yes, we even did the dark side of the moon, where that chinese robot lander is. No . . we did NOT delay NASA's wildly expensive search for more 13 billion year old galaxies that have already burned out and died. The public vitally needs to know whenever we find more of those . Why!? I'll tell you why. Because these finds provide a reassuring sense of order in the universe. One that is lacking here in DC.”[/i]

And I'd close my press conference by saying “Thanks for listening today”, take off my orange Leeloo curly mop wig (from “the third element” - see my avatar image - which looks like a day-glow version of Karine's 'do) and resign and have a drink.

Thanks for listening today. But I'm not resigning from snarky political posts. At least not until ALL the secret docs are found – Biden's, Trump's. Obama's. Hillary's. Musk's. You just know they're all sweating bullets, and checking their closets, garages, and former offices, right?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

LeopoldBloom · M

My favorite conspiracy theory is that Secret Service agents loyal to Trump are planting them.

SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F

@LeopoldBloom true fact - it was trumps own secret service agents who turned him to the FBI, when he moved that stuff to Mar A Largo. Nice to see fidelity to the laws of our nation supercede political ones.

LeopoldBloom · M

@SusanInFlorida Yep. They serve the U.S. government, not whoever happens to be President at any given time.

That being said, the relationship between Secret Service agents and the President is unlike anything else. It's not unusual for them to develop an attachment to the man they are guarding with their lives.

SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F

@LeopoldBloom "protect the king (president)' has been the loyalty oath of uniformed men from time immemorial.

LeopoldBloom · M

@SusanInFlorida True. However, it's drummed into the Secret Service that they protect the president as part of their duty to the American people. This is why, if Trump is indicted, the Secret Service will turn him over to the arresting authorities and not get into a fight with them to protect him.

This is also why conservative fever dreams of Trump staging a military coup are so idiotic. It's drummed into soldiers from day one that their duty is to the Constitution and the United States, and not whoever the leader happens to be.

SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F

@LeopoldBloom (disclosure - i am not a member of any political party). i think "public and media" anxiety over January 6th stems from the poor performance of the FBI in detecting and preparing for the gathering. And the hilariously incompetent/uncaring response of the "capitol police force", whose only fatality was a heart attack by an obese policeman when he saw some unruly rioters forcing their way into a building.

LeopoldBloom · M

@SusanInFlorida The Jan. 6 committee made it clear that the riot was the culmination of Trump's efforts over the preceding two months to challenge the election results, seat fake electors, pressure state officials to falsify their results, and finally, to ensure that security at the Capitol was inadequate to deal with the crowd he had assembled there. It was not just "poor planning" and a few unruly people who took it upon themselves to force their way in there.

Also, the FBI is an executive branch department and Trump was ultimately responsible for whatever their failures were.

SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F

@LeopoldBloom i agree entirely.

but would result in Biden being ultimately responsible for keeping the DOJ and FBI at hand's length away from the secret doc searches at his homes, his corvette garage, his "think tank" offices, etc.

appointing a special prosecutor who conducts all the searches/reviews of biden's locations SEEMS like nonpartisan neutrality. But it fails the test if those searches eschew the expertise of the FBI and legitimate experts.

imagine the January 6th investigations/hearings, if the FBI was not allowed to play a role. Or had been prevented from raiding Mar a Largo.

LeopoldBloom · M

@SusanInFlorida Which is why the AG, while nominally under the president's authority, is also accorded a certain degree of independence. It's also why the FBI director normally serves for ten years, meaning they're typically not appointed by the current president, but are a holdover from the prior administration.

It's definitely challenging to have an executive branch department overseeing the same executive branch. Congress of course has ultimate authority in its ability to impeach anyone in the administration, and the General Accounting Office is Congress' bureaucratic arm that oversees executive branch departments.

SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F

@LeopoldBloom only 1 of the last 4 FBI directors served for more than 5 years. and i'm not counting the 2 "acting directors". just the 4 who held the spot legitimately

LeopoldBloom · M

@SusanInFlorida Yeah, it doesn't work out as well in practice. But the DOJ has more independence from the White House than other government agencies, even if it's not as independent as we might wish.

Ultimately, Congress has the power of impeachment and removal as a last resort, and of course the people have the power to vote.

SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F

@LeopoldBloom my list of government agencies that ALLEGEDLY are independent, but have been repeatedly accused of carrying out partisan directives.

1. The IRS
2. The FBI
3. Department of Energy (fossil fuel policies)
4. Homeland Security (opposed by democrats when it was formed. they claimed it would be used for domestic surveillance)
5. Federal Reserve and Department of the treasury (manipulation of interest rates to benefit the incumbent occupant of the white house, continuously, for quite some time)

LeopoldBloom · M

@SusanInFlorida We're about to see performative "investigations" by Congress of at least the IRS and FBI, if that means anything.