This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
PrincessOfHell · F
It's based on a few things:
Poor education, valuing money over an overall healthier and happier society, bad examples they wrongfully call socialist, the unwillingness to look into social market economies, indoctrination under Mccarthyism, lack of historic understanding where socialist ideas come from, ....
Poor education, valuing money over an overall healthier and happier society, bad examples they wrongfully call socialist, the unwillingness to look into social market economies, indoctrination under Mccarthyism, lack of historic understanding where socialist ideas come from, ....

SW-User
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@SW-User you upset that she's right?

SW-User
@Guitarman123 Hardly. Little could be less significant then children regurgitating meaningless talking points (McCarthyism? Really?)
And you take her blather as gospel 😄
And you take her blather as gospel 😄
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@SW-User I'm aware of the history of socialism and what it stands for
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@SW-User so I know she's right

SW-User
@Guitarman123 Right. They are benevolently "for the people not profits"
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@SW-User yep that's socialism
PrincessOfHell · F
@SW-User You rather have me write an entire essay detailing my points? Also i'm not a child so I prefer not to be adressed as one.
Mc Carthy times... a witch hunt against progressive forces in US society.
Mc Carthy times... a witch hunt against progressive forces in US society.

SW-User
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@SW-User what would you suggest I read

SW-User
@PrincessOfHell McCarthy outed Communists. Most of America was too foolish to listen
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@SW-User any reading material you suggest?

SW-User
@Guitarman123 Adam Smith, Milton Freidman, any American Founding Father
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@SW-User what part of the wealth of nations or the theory of moral sentiment did Adam Smith advocate for exploiting workers for the benefit of the wealthy few? I've read both and didn't see him say such a thing. What he did say was that he believes that commodities value was based on the labour put into making that particular product and that the simplest of labour would make workers stupid