This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
because that's what every socialist country is
1-25 of 55
Thomas52 · 70-79, M
@DeluxedEdition Like the Scandinavian countries you mean?
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@Thomas52 like China or Venezuela ?
Thomas52 · 70-79, M
@DeluxedEdition Neither of those are Scandinavian. However, they are examples of extremes which countries would not wish to emulate
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@DeluxedEdition that dosent answer my question
Guitarman123 · 31-35, M
@DeluxedEdition every country has workers
OggggO · 36-40, M
@DeluxedEdition China is the world's second largest economy and has the highest Purchasing Power Parity. It's a repressive totalitarian state, but saying it has "no money" is just laughably nonsensical.
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@OggggO rich off of the exploitation of slave labor and paying people 3 dollars a day
OggggO · 36-40, M
@DeluxedEdition So you agree they aren't socialist, then?
Elessar · 26-30, M
@DeluxedEdition Ever heard of Finland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Iceland?
Most if not all of those have far better living standards and wealth distribution than both our countries.
Most if not all of those have far better living standards and wealth distribution than both our countries.
Elessar · 26-30, M
@revenant Did I ask for more excuses? You've said the condition was that a country should be rich first, I gave you a country that is, and you're now trying to climb on more mirrors to deny the evidence.
Sorry, socialist north countries function (much) better than others, USA included, from the perspective of the citizen and not that of the elite.
Sorry, socialist north countries function (much) better than others, USA included, from the perspective of the citizen and not that of the elite.
1-25 of 55