The Ruskie-Lovers in Today's Congress Are No Better Than the Pro-Nazis in Congress During World War II Who Spread Hitler's Propaganda.
36-40, F
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
fanuc2013 · 51-55, F
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@fanuc2013
The only way to have saved Poland would have been not to have allowed the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia without a fight. Had the war started in Czechoslovakia in 1938, the Poles would have had a fighting chance as the Germans would not have been able to field as many divisions as they did against Poland. The German war machine would have also been without the Czech munitions factories and tanks which they had captured without a fight.
The only way to have saved Poland would have been not to have allowed the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia without a fight. Had the war started in Czechoslovakia in 1938, the Poles would have had a fighting chance as the Germans would not have been able to field as many divisions as they did against Poland. The German war machine would have also been without the Czech munitions factories and tanks which they had captured without a fight.
ElwoodBlues · M
Agreed. The US right-wing Russia lovers, and Putin, seem to be forgetting a three-way treaty known as the [i]1994 Budapest Memorandum.[/i]
Essentially, Ukraine agreed to give up all its nuclear weapons to Russia in exchange for safety from a U.S. or Russian invasion. Russia's invasion of Ukraine violates that treaty. And as a signatory to that 1994 Budapest Memorandum, the U.S. has a definite interest in righting Putin's current wrongs.
[quote]In the final version of the deal, Russia promised not to attack Ukraine. While the U.S. and the U.K. assured Ukraine they would aid if it was attacked by Russia, that promised aid did not guarantee military support like a NATO country would receive.
In 2009, Russia and the U.S. announced that the assurances in the Budapest Memorandum would continue to remain in effect in the future.
[/quote]
https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/global-conflicts/ukraine-agreed-to-give-up-nukes-in-exchange-for-safety-from-russia-invasion-attack-budapest-memorandum-treaty/536-8748a51f-10ee-47f0-be30-b4088750ee44
Sorry, Russkie lovers, but Russia promised [i]specifically[/i] NOT to invade Ukraine, and the U.S. promised [i]specifically[/i] to ASSIST Ukraine if the treaty were ever violated. And that's what the U.S. is doing now.
Essentially, Ukraine agreed to give up all its nuclear weapons to Russia in exchange for safety from a U.S. or Russian invasion. Russia's invasion of Ukraine violates that treaty. And as a signatory to that 1994 Budapest Memorandum, the U.S. has a definite interest in righting Putin's current wrongs.
[quote]In the final version of the deal, Russia promised not to attack Ukraine. While the U.S. and the U.K. assured Ukraine they would aid if it was attacked by Russia, that promised aid did not guarantee military support like a NATO country would receive.
In 2009, Russia and the U.S. announced that the assurances in the Budapest Memorandum would continue to remain in effect in the future.
[/quote]
https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/global-conflicts/ukraine-agreed-to-give-up-nukes-in-exchange-for-safety-from-russia-invasion-attack-budapest-memorandum-treaty/536-8748a51f-10ee-47f0-be30-b4088750ee44
Sorry, Russkie lovers, but Russia promised [i]specifically[/i] NOT to invade Ukraine, and the U.S. promised [i]specifically[/i] to ASSIST Ukraine if the treaty were ever violated. And that's what the U.S. is doing now.
SomeMichGuy · M
@ElwoodBlues And this also demonstrates:
• BREAKING your word under international law,
v.
• KEEPING your word under international law.
I like being on the good side of that. I wonder where the "family values" folks side on that? Lying is ok?
• BREAKING your word under international law,
v.
• KEEPING your word under international law.
I like being on the good side of that. I wonder where the "family values" folks side on that? Lying is ok?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
