This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@LvChris New York State democrats did not do their jobs in vetting the now congressman.
Vin53 · M
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Vin53 He's a Republican. He will not resign for lying. None of them do,.
ElwoodBlues · M
Yep, when reporters checked up on his claimed credentials, they came up FALSE!!
Representatives for New York University and Baruch College confirmed to ABC News that they have no record of Santos attending their institutions.
However, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) website states he received degrees from NYU and Baruch. His campaign website also said he graduated from Baruch.
The same biography on the NRCC site claimed that Santos worked for companies such as Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. But a spokesperson for Goldman Sachs told ABC News that they have no record of Santos ever being employed there. Citigroup has not returned ABC's request for comment.
According to an archived version of his campaign website, Santos previously said he ran a 501(c)(3) charity called Friends of Pets United, but a search on the IRS' website did not find a listing for a charity under that name.
The mention of Friends of Pets United appears to have been removed from Santos' campaign website.
ABC here is just retracing the questions raised by the NY Times; all the institutions also told the Times they had no record of Santos' claims.
Also there are also problems with Santos' financial disclosure forms. He claims to have earned big money at his "family firm," where he oversaw $80 million in client assets as the managing principal. However, disclosure rules require disclosure of the major clients and Santos failed to name a single client.
Representatives for New York University and Baruch College confirmed to ABC News that they have no record of Santos attending their institutions.
However, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) website states he received degrees from NYU and Baruch. His campaign website also said he graduated from Baruch.
The same biography on the NRCC site claimed that Santos worked for companies such as Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. But a spokesperson for Goldman Sachs told ABC News that they have no record of Santos ever being employed there. Citigroup has not returned ABC's request for comment.
According to an archived version of his campaign website, Santos previously said he ran a 501(c)(3) charity called Friends of Pets United, but a search on the IRS' website did not find a listing for a charity under that name.
The mention of Friends of Pets United appears to have been removed from Santos' campaign website.
ABC here is just retracing the questions raised by the NY Times; all the institutions also told the Times they had no record of Santos' claims.
Also there are also problems with Santos' financial disclosure forms. He claims to have earned big money at his "family firm," where he oversaw $80 million in client assets as the managing principal. However, disclosure rules require disclosure of the major clients and Santos failed to name a single client.
SomeMichGuy · M
@ElwoodBlues What an idiot.
BohemianBabe · M
Dude is a pathological liar. He should run for president, Republicans will love him.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
This is standard fare for Republicans. Facts don't matter, only what you say. He'd be a good presidential candidate for them.
SomeMichGuy · M
@windinhishair Can't disagree...smh.
ilikeitlikethat23 · 61-69, M
Kick him out of thecountry, we have enough domestic liars.
SomeMichGuy · M
@ilikeitlikethat23 True! "Liar? We have already filled all of those positions for the foreseeable future."
independentone · M
About what one should expect from a Republican. Lying, cheating, and stealing comes natural to them.
SomeMichGuy · M
@independentone It's sad, isn't it?
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Thanks for labeling yourself as a repeat liar. Saves much time.
ElwoodBlues · M
@MasterLee Too bad you can't identify a SINGLE lie in what the OP wrote. But making accusations you can't back up is kinda par for the course for you, isn't it?
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues why are you talking to me