Elon Musk's Twitter Files
I'm really not getting why this is supposedly important. Can someone explain to me? I've read through his threads, and what I see is internal chatter about how to respond to TOS violations. It is exactly what I would expect. What am I missing?
Every social media platform has a Terms of Service that says they can ban or restrict you for violations. You agree to it when you sign up. I've been a moderator of online forums and groups before and dealing with TOS violations is part of the job. Usually before you ban someone you have discussions with other moderators. How is what Musk is posting any different? Because the users happen to be high profile elected officials? Because it is other government officials making the requests? I see no reason why other government officials cannot report TOS violations. It is up to Twitter whether to act on them and banning someone for such violations is not a restriction on "free speech". Nobody has to use Twitter, and frankly 90% of the population could care less about what happens on Twitter. Restricting the Biden laptop story? It's not like there were no other outlets reporting on the story and reading the internal discussion it sounds like there were legitimate concerns about spreading foreign disinformation. Those that wanted to hear about that story did so through other means.
Clearly Trump and those banned violated TOS agreements. Those on the right had just as much right to flag left-leaning posts and have them removed, too. The difference being those on the left weren't violating the TOS agreements by spreading outright lies - that's why the "conservatives" were being banned and not the liberals. A big DUUUUH here.
If someone else can explain this defiantly, please try.
Every social media platform has a Terms of Service that says they can ban or restrict you for violations. You agree to it when you sign up. I've been a moderator of online forums and groups before and dealing with TOS violations is part of the job. Usually before you ban someone you have discussions with other moderators. How is what Musk is posting any different? Because the users happen to be high profile elected officials? Because it is other government officials making the requests? I see no reason why other government officials cannot report TOS violations. It is up to Twitter whether to act on them and banning someone for such violations is not a restriction on "free speech". Nobody has to use Twitter, and frankly 90% of the population could care less about what happens on Twitter. Restricting the Biden laptop story? It's not like there were no other outlets reporting on the story and reading the internal discussion it sounds like there were legitimate concerns about spreading foreign disinformation. Those that wanted to hear about that story did so through other means.
Clearly Trump and those banned violated TOS agreements. Those on the right had just as much right to flag left-leaning posts and have them removed, too. The difference being those on the left weren't violating the TOS agreements by spreading outright lies - that's why the "conservatives" were being banned and not the liberals. A big DUUUUH here.
If someone else can explain this defiantly, please try.