Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

So our mighty (dismantled) military could defeat Russia?

Extract from the third in a series of three articles on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, by Lieutenant-General Jonathon Riley, December 9, 2022

[b]
Western defence industry shows no sign of re-tooling, expanding, or being given government orders. Nato nations should also, if they believe their own rhetoric, be increasing the size and capability of their forces. So far there has been talk from Germany and France but no more. Britain has proposed an increase in spending (unlikely now under Hunt’s austerity programme) but the increase is not tied to the sort of capabilities need – aircraft, ships, tanks, artillery.The talk is all of cyber and EW (electronic warfare).And yet our front-line tank strength is no more than 200, the IFV (infantry fighting vehicle)capability is about to disappear – on paper for a decade but in reality for ever – our artillery is antiquated and small in numbers, our air defence capability is almost zero.Ben Wallace, Secretary of State for Defence, recently described the British Army as funded enough only to ‘stay at home and do a bit of tootling around’
[/b]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
And here in Canada our fighting forces number 23,000. There are lots of other people employed by the armed forces but they are not considered fighting forces. Most of the non fighters are civilian and many of them are women. Last February the federal government was upset buy a bunch of trucks in the capital. I asked the army if it were ready to move in. The army said No. Eventually Trudeau had to bring in a bunch of WEF 'police' from overseas. The Canadian police had lost control or simply refused to intervene in a legal protest.