fbir Clears President Trump

"That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said. FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets. Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property."

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

TallMtnMedic · M

Omg, the humanity!!!

ElwoodBlues · M

@TallMtnMedic Actually, profiting from the documents is just one of many charges Trump could face. He might be off one small hook but he's still in jeopardy for removing SCI docs from their secure locations and for obstructing justice.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues

ElwoodBlues · M

@sunsporter1649

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

TallMtnMedic · M

@ElwoodBlues Wont face, he actually hasnt broken a law, unless you have some proof the dems havent thought of in the last six years.

We'll wait after all you must have proof, not what about isms, right? Dems been looking and pulling it out of thin air for a few years, surely you have the proof! No one else!

Meanwhile the big guy getting his cut right? Pelosi for insider trading, dems getting $$$ from Ukraine deals..... You know, actual crimes that your ok with.

ElwoodBlues · M

@TallMtnMedic Funny thing: republicans were FOR the ouster of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin before they were against it! LOL!!!
https://www.portman.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/portman-durbin-shaheen-and-senate-ukraine-caucus-reaffirm-commitment-help
So was the EU!
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/eu-hails-sacking-of-ukraine-s-prosecutor-viktor-shokin-1.2591190

BTW, Trump's 112,000 person Dept of Justice had FOUR YEARS to look into the firing of Shokin. What did they come up with? Nothingburger. Nice attempt to move the goalposts away from Trump's crimes though, LOL!!!

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues [media=https://youtu.be/NwUmVIrxptM]

ElwoodBlues · M

@sunsporter1649 Funny thing: republicans were FOR the ouster of Ukraine prosecutor Shokin before they were against it! LOL!!!
https://www.portman.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/portman-durbin-shaheen-and-senate-ukraine-caucus-reaffirm-commitment-help
So was the EU!
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/eu-hails-sacking-of-ukraine-s-prosecutor-viktor-shokin-1.2591190

BTW, Trump's 112,000 person Dept of Justice had FOUR YEARS to look into the firing of Shokin. What did they come up with? Nothingburger. Nice attempt to move the goalposts away from Trump's crimes though, LOL!!!

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues You telling us sippy-cup lied again! Whouda thunk it!

ElwoodBlues · M

@sunsporter1649 I'm telling you Trump lied again, LOL!!!

There's that obstruction of justice case where he told underlings to move boxes out of the basement storage room, then sent his lawyers to the basement storage room to "make certain" no classified documents remain. The FBI heard about this from an informant, then subpoenaed security video from Mar-a-Lago hallways, and THEN raided the place and found the moved boxes. Crystal clear obstruction of justice.

But you keep changing the subject, don't ya? Wonder why, LOL!!!