Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

It is very simple

If you think a boy can become a girl just because he wants to be a girl, you are an idiot.
You shouldn't be allowed to vote.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Reason10 · 70-79, M
@BohemianBabe A woman has female organs and is capable of giving birth to a child. That is science.
@Reason10 So if a female is infertile, she's not a woman? If a female has her womb removed, is she no longer a woman?
Reason10 · 70-79, M
@BohemianBabe Show us some examples of a woman whose womb was removed.
@Reason10 By your definition, these people aren't women anymore.

https://www.ranker.com/list/celebrities-with-hysterectomies/celebrity-lists
Reason10 · 70-79, M
@BohemianBabe You are not only a liar, it's entirely possible you might be one of the dumbest carbon based life forms around.

(To bring the other posters up to speed with Boo's latest BooShit claim, somehow a hysterectomy means a woman becomes a man.)

Women get hysterectomies sometimes to save their lives. Very often a woman inflicted with uterine cancer is saved a gruesome death with a hysterectomy. In no way does that (a) make a woman a man, or (b) make a woman any less a woman.

How about a woman having to get a mastectomy due to breast cancer? Has she become a man as well?

I'm really starting to think you haven't gotten past kindergarten in a blue state, with ignorant statements like the oens you are spewing.
@Reason10
Women get hysterectomies sometimes to save their lives. Very often a woman inflicted with uterine cancer is saved a gruesome death with a hysterectomy. In no way does that (a) make a woman a man, or (b) make a woman any less a woman.

But you said in order for someone to be a woman, they need to be able to give birth and have female parts.
So are you backpedaling now that you've realized you're wrong and very very stupid?
DavidT8899 · 22-25, M
@Reason10 Heres the truth:historically,there have always been a miniscule portion of the population who are legitimately androgynous;their chromosomes are physically arranged so that they dont clearly express one distinct sex.And yes,they are a special case that should be given special considerations in self-identification.But as I said before,that only represents an EXTREMELY SMALL part of society,and their existence,while real,should not serve as a basis for rewriting the norms of gender for everyone;it doesnt explain or justify the recent EXPLOSION of chlidren-and adults-who have suddenly and abruptly decided to switch sexs at a moments notice.If this phenomenon was based on legitimate science,why is it only happening now?Shouldnt all of this"coming out"have been happening a long time ago?Clearly,pepole are being influenced by the changes in CULTURE to pretend to be another sex;to put it on like some kind of costume to wear at will and for their own purposes.Its sort of sick,and not at all based on reality.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@Reason10
A woman has female organs and is capable of giving birth to a child. That is science.

Women get hysterectomies sometimes to save their lives. Very often a woman inflicted with uterine cancer is saved a gruesome death with a hysterectomy. In no way does that (a) make a woman a man, or (b) make a woman any less a woman.

Pick one
BlueVeins · 22-25
@BohemianBabe lmao the way he defined it, a post-menopausal chick isn't a woman
@BlueVeins This is really a perfect case of how inconsistent the Right is. They claim that the Left doesn't know what a woman is, but really, they just disagree with our definition. When it comes to their own definition, they don't have one.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@BohemianBabe Status Quo Warriors are and always have been a joke