Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Seth Rich proves Trump innocent and democrats guilty

Seth Rich was murdered shortly after Assange announced he had obtained a trove of DNC emails showing dirty DNC secrets. That theft of DNC emails enraged Hillary and her campaign team. What do we know about Seth Rich? He was a Sanders supporter who was offended by the crooked way Hillary and the DNC stacked the deck against Bernie Sanders. What does Rich prove?

Rich proved the democrats lied about the emails, Trump, and the involvement of the DC police and the FBI in the coverup of the murder. The FBI lied about having Rich's computer. The DC police claimed Rich was murdered on the street in a robbery, but the DC police did not report that someone broke into Rich's apartment and stole his computer. When asked about Rich's computer the FBI lied, claiming it did not have it. The democrats claimed Trump colluded with Russia to steal the emails, but that was proven to have been a deliberate lie. Robert Mueller was hired to get to the bottom of the email theft but he never found out who stole the emails and he never looked into the Seth Rich connection to the case in spite of Assange suggesting it was Rich who exfiltrated the emails.

Rich proves the democrats lied about Rich and his murder and then lied about Trump, and that proves the democrats colluded to lie about what really happened in the exfiltration of the emails.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Can you explain How Rich proved anything you say he proves?

Factual assertions aside, I'm not even seeing your logic.
marke · 70-79, M
@MistyCee
Rich speaks from the dead through the fact that Mueller refused to look into the Rich connection suggested by Assange even though he found no other suspect in the exfiltration of the DNC emails Assange ended up exposing. There is absolutely no justification for Mueller's avoidance of the Seth Rich connection apart from corrupt democrat influence over his investigation.

Rich proves the FBI is dishonest because the FBI claimed it had no evidence that Rich's murder was anything other than a street robbery yet the FBI ended up possessing Rich's computer from his apartment it denied it had.
@marke So, there are alleged facts related to Rich that prove things?
@marke
Mueller ... found no other suspect in the exfiltration of the DNC emails
That's patently false. Mueller found metadata on files on the computers of Russian hackers proving they stole the DNC emails. It's all in the Mueller report.
marke · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues

You cannot find in the Mueller report the name of a single hacker or info on how that hacker supposedly stole the DNC emails and delivered them to Assange. Democrats invented fake conspiracy theories and fake crooks to blame the exfiltration of the emails on, but it was Seth Rich who gave the emails to Assange. No government agency anywhere has given us the name of any other person who might have done it instead.
@marke Lemme just quote crowdstrike:
Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?

Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.

Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network.
https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/

Note the source of the link! Crowstrike itself is saying they have proof Russia hacked the DNC.

You haven't provided a single link to back up your claims. You seem to be badly misrepresenting crowdstrike's statements. Maybe you want to clear that up?
@marke @ElwoodBlues Just out of curiosity, is your username going to disappear when Elwood's done with you?