This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultCreative
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Would the USA be Better off with 7 Major Political Parties?

Poll - Total Votes: 13
One Political Party
Two Political Parties
Three Political Parties
Four Political Parties
Five Political Parties
6+ Political Parties
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
Someone brought up "RINO's" (republicans in name only). This of course leads directly into DINO's, if you bring in the centrist factions of each, (the RIF's & DIF's..?) you could make four parties. This would absolutely open the door for the existing 3rd parties, Green and Gold. Add one spoiler and you could have a much more complex and dysfunctional federal government.

I believe this would be a benefit for all mankind!

Are two parties enough?

Are eight too many??

You decide!

DUN-DUN-DUnnnnnnnnn...
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Penny · 46-50, F
why not abolish the party system altogether. apparently all it does is cause dissension
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@Penny is that a vote for one party..?
Penny · 46-50, F
@GerOttman lol no. vote for no parties lol
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@Penny full anarchy, not a completely terrible ides!
Penny · 46-50, F
@GerOttman lol. not anarchy. individualism.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@Penny technically that is anarchy..
Penny · 46-50, F
@GerOttman only if its allowed to happen lol. and i dont exactly thin kthat no political parties spells anarchy. though honestly i think there's like a hint of anarchy with them lol
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@Penny anarchy as a political system was a popular concept many years ago. it means no government at all. people just have to get along on their own, more or less.
Penny · 46-50, F
@GerOttman well, i am definitely not suggesting that
Really · 80-89, M
@Penny No parties; all independent members free of anyone else's ideology. I've thought about that a lot, not in connection with the USA but in general and for my own country. There are arguments against it but I think it could work, and could be much better than any system I've seen.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@Really kind of a John Lennon vibe going on there!
Really · 80-89, M
@GerOttman
technically that is anarchy
Literally that's semantics
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@Really look it up..
Really · 80-89, M
@GerOttman I did.

ĭt

pronoun

Used to refer to that one previously mentioned.

Used of a nonhuman entity; an animate being whose sex is unspecified, unknown, or irrelevant; a group of objects or individuals; an action; or an abstraction.

Used as the subject of an impersonal verb.Used as an anticipatory subject or object.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@Really it's called google...

"Anarchism is a political philosophy and movement that is skeptical of all justifications for authority and seeks to abolish the institutions they claim maintain unnecessary coercion and hierarchy, typically including, though not necessarily limited to, the state and capitalism."
Really · 80-89, M
@GerOttman I know what Google is and it's riddled with baloney as I'm sure you know. You should be thoroughly skeptical when you go there, but like SW it's good for a few laughs; and I know what anarchy is, in general terms. None of which has any relevance to the ideas I'm throwing out - obviously onto stony ground.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@Really yeahhh... I've been familiar with this concept for longer than google has been around. I'm an old guy, we used to have to use these things called 'books'. awful smelly heavy things! But I will willing acknowledge that you are the smartest man on the internet if it helps...
Really · 80-89, M
@GerOttman Thanks for your offer but I'm more selective about 'helpers'.

I read a lot, mostly non fiction. I was already reading at least 20 years before you were born (assuming you've posted your true age bracket)

'Bye now. I need someone sensible to talk to.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@Really Sooo smart I mean really really smart!