Trump Stole Top Secret Material on U.S. Nuclear Attack Plans When He Left the White House.

He claims he declassified them. Huh? Why? To give our nuclear attack strategy to his buddy, Vlady?

LOCK HIM UP! And throw away the f*cking key!

The documents, according to the Washington Post, described a foreign nation's ability to attack with nuclear weapons and their ability defend against similar attacks. The country's in question are not mentioned in the report.

(Hint. It's not our allies and North Korea, India and Pakistan have no ability to defend against a U.S. nuclear attack. That leaves only two possibilities: Russia and/or China.)

Trump has also stated that he declassified all of the documents that he took with him to Mar-a-Lago.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11187407/Highly-classified-documents-held-Mar-Lago-contained-foreign-nuclear-secrets.html

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

krf336 · M

@tindrummer no, she cited the daily mail story that was citing a weeks old washington post article. Neither of which cites an actual source.
It also ignores the fact that even the article she cited states they were looking for documents that were "formerly restricted" which implies they knew beforehand that the documents were declassified.
Second, the redacted affadavit that was released doesnt say anything about nuclear secrets and its only news organazions like the daily mail claiming that. The only thing it says is that they wanted to retrieve documents. (Which it appears really werent that important for the last 2 years) the fact that that they were suddenly dangerous 2 months before what looks like a horrible november for a certain half of congress is a head scratcher.
So again. Name a credible source that is not quoting a weeks old report that actually has a source that can be verified.

SomeMichGuy · M

@krf336

It also ignores the fact that even the article she cited states they were looking for documents that were "formerly restricted" which implies they knew beforehand that the documents were declassified.

That's not what the warrant says.

Look it up. It's "Attachment B Property to be siezed", p. 4 of the 7 pp. originally released.

The only thing it says is that they wanted to retrieve documents. (Which it appears really werent that important for the last 2 years) the fact that that they were suddenly dangerous 2 months before what looks like a horrible november for a certain half of congress is a head scratcher.

No.

The documents were being requested for a long time. The recently-released letter (dated 10 May) from the acting Archivist of the US to Trump's lawyer details some of this, and includes a passage from the DoJ's letter (of 29 April, I think) to Trump's lawyer which details some of what was found.

These are real sources which answer your questions, but can't fix your cult programming.

tindrummer · M

@krf336 still no source for your claim that it was disproved
do you acknowledge that t has broken ANY laws having to do with govt documents including the ones he made a lot stricter?

This comment is hidden. Show Comment