Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Barack Millhouse Obama Has Missing Records. When Will the FBI Ransack His House

"If the Federal Bureau of Investigation is going to be roving the countryside looking for presidential documents, then Barack Obama’s residence must be next. By now, you all know about the federal raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, executed under the pretense of document retrieval. The FBI deployed many agents to find documents for the National Archives. The political class doesn’t want Trump to run again, and they used their allies at the Department of Justice to deliver that warning. Agents broke into the safe, manhandled Melania Trump’s clothing, and absconded with boxes of supposed documents meant for preservation, but reportedly barred Trump’s lawyers from overseeing the search.

All of this over some reported missing records—it’s just waggish that the feds would think we, the American people, would buy this narrative. I don’t think even the staunchest Trump hater even believes this line, with their main criticism being just that—the cover story isn’t plausible. It’s not, but let’s have some fun with this game. If federal agents are roving nationwide to ensure the National Archives is content, then Obama’s house must be ransacked next because the issue tracking all his documents stems back to 2018. Troves of Obama files went missing—vanished into the ether. Real Clear Politics around this time reported on the lost files, with Hillary Clinton’s email fiasco via her private homebrew server again being mentioned (via RCP):

In the middle of directing the difficult task of transferring the historically important records of the Obama administration into the National Archives, the archivist in charge, David Ferriero, ran into a serious problem: A lot of key records are missing.

A first-rate librarian, Ferriero has been driving a much-needed digital overhaul and expansion of the National Archives over the nine years of his appointment. This will greatly improve the ability of digital search locally and remotely, as well as accessing the files themselves.

To support this effort, in 2014 President Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments. For the first time electronic government records were placed under the 1950 Federal Records Act. The new law also included updates clarifying "the responsibilities of federal government officials when using non-government email systems" and empowering "the National Archives to safeguard original and classified records from unauthorized removal.” Additionally, it gives the Archivist of the United States the final authority in determining just what is a government record.

And yet the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and “loss” of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges. So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record “losses” as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it “an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws."
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
The old saying, "be careful what you wish for" might apply. The precedent has been set.
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@BizSuitStacy There is no precedent here. But you don't like being told the simple facts. The search of Trump's place was like others done by the FBI all the time.

Most people don't carry on as they are special and should be above such mundane practices.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Zeusdelight If the Federal Bureau of Investigation is going to be roving the countryside looking for presidential documents, then Barack Obama’s residence must be next. By now, you all know about the federal raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, executed under the pretense of document retrieval. The FBI deployed many agents to find documents for the National Archives. The political class doesn’t want Trump to run again, and they used their allies at the Department of Justice to deliver that warning. Agents broke into the safe, manhandled Melania Trump’s clothing, and absconded with boxes of supposed documents meant for preservation, but reportedly barred Trump’s lawyers from overseeing the search.

All of this over some reported missing records—it’s just waggish that the feds would think we, the American people, would buy this narrative. I don’t think even the staunchest Trump hater even believes this line, with their main criticism being just that—the cover story isn’t plausible. It’s not, but let’s have some fun with this game. If federal agents are roving nationwide to ensure the National Archives is content, then Obama’s house must be ransacked next because the issue tracking all his documents stems back to 2018. Troves of Obama files went missing—vanished into the ether. Real Clear Politics around this time reported on the lost files, with Hillary Clinton’s email fiasco via her private homebrew server again being mentioned (via RCP):

In the middle of directing the difficult task of transferring the historically important records of the Obama administration into the National Archives, the archivist in charge, David Ferriero, ran into a serious problem: A lot of key records are missing.

A first-rate librarian, Ferriero has been driving a much-needed digital overhaul and expansion of the National Archives over the nine years of his appointment. This will greatly improve the ability of digital search locally and remotely, as well as accessing the files themselves.

To support this effort, in 2014 President Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments. For the first time electronic government records were placed under the 1950 Federal Records Act. The new law also included updates clarifying "the responsibilities of federal government officials when using non-government email systems" and empowering "the National Archives to safeguard original and classified records from unauthorized removal.” Additionally, it gives the Archivist of the United States the final authority in determining just what is a government record.

And yet the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and “loss” of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges. So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record “losses” as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it “an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws.”
@Zeusdelight simple facts? Oh, like these?
You people never learn. Never.
@sunsporter1649
President Trump is thinking along the same lined as you...
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@BizSuitStacy @sunsporter1649 I am always amused at you two. You continually bring up stuff that no one has cared about for years. Your obsession with this bloke is ridiculous and extraordinarily sad.

You care more about him than he does about anyone.
@Zeusdelight
And yet here you are below...
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@BizSuitStacy I have no idea what the MSM is and don't really care what others say they are going to do to the Republicans or Democrats or Trump or other people.

I simply care about the normal democratic processes and their importance.
@Zeusdelight If you don't know, then maybe you should butt out. Your comments show you're uniformed.
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@BizSuitStacy What an amazing argument!!

First, you say I am thrilled by MSM threats to get Trump, then you say they are a source of credible information, as I am uninformed by not knowing them.

Make up your mind.
@Zeusdelight pointing out that you're uninformed? No...that was the first time, though it's pretty obvious. If you don't care about American politics, why do you feel such a need to bash Trump?

For example...you somehow seem to think the FBI is trust worthy. It means you ain't paying attention.

Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@BizSuitStacy Not informed by your sources and am very happy about it. You want to tear the US apart with your arguments. I wonder what you are getting out of it?

I was talking about your argument, not what you pointed out, but as usual, you didn;t comprehend my answer.

Sorry, I must remember to keep it simple for you.
@Zeusdelight
You wrote:
[quote]I have no idea what the MSM is[/quote]

Then you wrote:
[quote]First, you say I am thrilled by MSM threats to get Trump[/quote]
Where did I say that? You said you don't even know what the MSM is.

Then you wrote:
[quote]then you say they are a source of credible information[/quote]
I double dog dare you to point out where I said the MSM was credible.

Finally you wrote:
[quote]as usual, you didn;t comprehend my answer.[/quote]
Dude...no one understands what you're saying. You ramble. You contradict yourself. You claim you don't care, but you won't leave it alone. And you seriously aren't making any sense. Maybe a prescription change would help.
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@BizSuitStacy I am sure you would know more about drugs than I. It would explain a lot of your views.

You don't even understand what you have said and I am not going to explain it to you.