Pregnant woman, or pregnant person?

In recent years, it has become normalized to refer to pregnant women as pregnant people. When I was pregnant with my firstborn, I noticed this in various forms of medical literature. Much of it was in articles from legitimate medical sources. This isn't just a trend on social media, it has actually become commonplace to use this term and we as individuals are being encouraged to use it too. The words and expressions that people use are always influenced by the culture around them, and the world that they live in. In the case of the West, that world is now one where authorities, including the most important in delivering information relevant to pregnant women, are deviating from actual medical realities for the sake of ideology. They seek to further an agenda that proclaims to advocate rights and equality when in essence it has nothing to do with that. Women who do not identify as women are in an extreme minority, and they should be treated as such.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

jehova · 31-35, M

Ok I do see ur reasonable objection. Unfortunately we as a society have finally accepted that it isn't that simple. So far there was a pregnant man in California. They didn't know she was pregnant until after the sex change. There are at least 2 genders that are hybrid of female male and those 2 are sometimes known to lay eggs. Recent research determined that women can fertilize their own or other women's eggs. So the conversation has changed. Generally yes women get pregnant but throw in gender identity and it gets even more complicated. Sorry this is the new reality.

SW-User

@jehova

Recent research determined that women can fertilize their own or other women's eggs.

how so?

jehova · 31-35, M

@SW-User ovum fluid and squirt juice has been recently shown to act as the fertilizing agents from women. I'll try to find that study hold on

jehova · 31-35, M

Using female stem cells doctors have produced primative sperm cells. Thus men were never and still aren't necessary

SW-User

@jehova never heard about that... Seems suspicious that's real

SW-User

@jehova Give me an example of a biological male who has got pregnant. If you can't, then the "objection" (as you call it) still stands and it remains the case that only women can get pregnant. I am aware of the case you are referring to, but this person was a biological woman and not a biological man. Clearly she was still able to ovulate, hence why she got pregnant.

SW-User

@SW-User He's full of shit. I've heard of two female mice being able to produce offspring together...they both had partially male DNA though. It's a long story but they were essentially mutants. Obviously this had to be totally facilitated by scientists because it's not naturally possible.