Top | Newest First | Oldest First
easterniowegin · 51-55, M
If a "right" can be removed, it was never truly a right.
Are you attempting to control the thoughts/opinions of ppl by removing other "rights" from them? That's fascism, not freedom. And the notion is unconstitutional (see the 9thA). You can't use one right as means to remove another.
Are you attempting to control the thoughts/opinions of ppl by removing other "rights" from them? That's fascism, not freedom. And the notion is unconstitutional (see the 9thA). You can't use one right as means to remove another.
View 13 more replies »
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@easterniowegin It's all related. You want to control a woman's body based on your view of the world. You want to declare what judges rule as proper when it agrees with your view of the world and when that same court of judges rules against your view of the world you want to stand on your rickety soap box to declare a foul.
The NRA is the same. Make sure you understand the topic.
The NRA is the same. Make sure you understand the topic.
easterniowegin · 51-55, M
@MarkPaul how does scotus correctly stating that abortion is NOT a right protected by the constitution have anything to do with controlling a woman's body? You're jumping to conclusions.
I'm not going to entertain further emotional bs from you on all other topics. Stick to the topic.
I'm not going to entertain further emotional bs from you on all other topics. Stick to the topic.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@easterniowegin If "Scotus" was wrong before they can be wrong now. You're inconsistent and seem to be uncertain about the topic. Stay focused.
no .. i think we need to get rid of the two party system. it would confuse a lot of people.
just debates on tv between people running. mass media now . it could happen.
just debates on tv between people running. mass media now . it could happen.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
Nope.