Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do you think the President remembers saying this?

2006
I do not view abortion as a, um, as choice and a right. I think it’s always a tragedy. And I think that it should be rare and safe, and I think we should be focusing on how to limit the number of abortions. And there ought to be able to have a common ground and consensus as to do that.”

2022

It's a sad day for the country.

Nearly 50 years ago, Roe vs. Wade was decided. Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people.

Personal freedoms are on the ballot this fall.
Top | New | Old
carpediem · 61-69, M Best Comment
He says what ever is on his little card
carpediem · 61-69, M
@FreeSpirit1 I agree completely. He's a puppet
Vin53 · M
Except you got the wrong potus friend.


@carpediem
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
@carpediem All true fact

Coffeequilt · 51-55, F
Definitely not. He doesn't remember what he had for breakfast this morning
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
I'd say yes and then point out there is no inconsistency between the two statements, even if you are trying to imply there is.
@ChipmunkErnie If there is no inconsistency why would he have to change? I think his true opinion is from 2006, the same opinion he has always held and what was released yesterday was written by someone else.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@FreeSpirit1 He said nothing about banning abortions back then, he's just more strongly against banning them now. I'm sorry that upsets you, but it's pretty meaningless. Like I said, people can grow, learn, even -- GASP -- learn and change an opinion.
@ChipmunkErnie I'm not upset but it seems like you are twisting yourself into a pretzel making excuses for the two different statements.
If you think a guy has one opinion that he has held consistently until he in his mid 70's then changes it, you are welcome to believe that, I don't buy it
SW-User
[media=https://youtu.be/NglssDgZ-yE]

Same , but different
SW-User
@SW-User Politicians change with what's popular; they appeal to their voters. It's not really their job to have personal convictions, as reprehensible as we may find that.
SW-User
@SW-User exactly..
Carissimi · F
I agree with his statement from 2006.
@Carissimi The present decision is in line with his 2006 thoughts, but whatever. 🤷‍♀️
Carissimi · F
How so? It’s the opposite. @FreeSpirit1
@Carissimi the decision that abortion is not a constitutional right is what he said in 2006, what he is saying now I think someone else wrote for him, I believe he is in favor of abortion being legal and rare and it's not a constitutional right.
Roadsterrider · 56-60, M
Counting midterms and presidential elections there have been around 13 elections since 2006 when he said this, he has probably flip-flopped on abortion a dozen times since 2006, he is a politician, he says what he thinks people want to hear or what is likely to get him reelected.
Pfuzylogic · M
He is Catholic. It is complicated.
SW-User
What ever fits his agenda he says, must be sad to not have a true opinion and be able to express it.
SW-User
@Whyme …try buying insulin without taking out a loan
uncalled4 · 56-60, M
Typical politician, pandering to whichever side he thinks will get him further.
Driver2 · M
The guy is a political shapeshifter always was

Only now he truly has no idea of what he said
The first comment was before Joe knew about the industry for fetal parts.
He’s a POS. Always has been
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
Half the time he doesnt even remember who the hell be is. So he sure as hell can't remember all the lies he tells from year to year.
Doctrble · 51-55, M
He dont even remember to pull dick out of undies before he pees.
SW-User
I don't understand why you dislike Biden, he is Republican-Lite, not a "liberal" as your side keeps labeling him when it suits your narrative that everyone who is not Trump is a raging commie
SW-User
@SW-User …..um , ok

It seems like we are on the same side…let me clarify, if I may.

I am a proponent of universal/human rights.
However, that flies in the face of what the government “allows” us to have.

If we rely on the government, “bill of rights “ codes ,statutes …they are subject to change…because those are temporary privileges..

There are several countries that have more rights than the US does…

***Rights are to be fought for……

Looking at a politician’s career and looking for inconsistencies is easy. Thus this post is low hanging fruit.

***My point of us v them…is the political reality we live in..

As long as people stay distracted the more we will lose to interests that don’t represent us…
@SW-User Bottom line is he sucks. End of story
@SW-User Fascists think that everyone to the Left of Fascism is far-left Socialism.
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
Next step will be against homosexuals, like the nazies
@ChipmunkErnie So you do think that's going to happen in the United States, ok.
@Strictmichael75 Other members of the SCOTUS have already stated any cases against gay marriage or gay rights will be voted down
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
@stratosranger wait and see

 
Post Comment