Top | Newest First | Oldest First
MistyCee Best Comment
14th Amendment, Section 3
But who knows what applies to Trump.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
But who knows what applies to Trump.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
View 16 more replies »
@MarmeeMarch The "framers" didn't write the 14th Amendment. That was added after the Civil War.
TexChik · F
@MistyCee I think first you have to prove there was an insurrection. Explain why a policeman shot and killed an unarmed woman (active-duty military on leave) inside the capital that was on video trying to stop people from going in. Explain why biden has hidden that officer away. Explain why the capital was unguarded at that time. Then explain to us why in the previous 9 months before Jan 6, there was no liberal outcry or concern for the BLM and Antifa riots that were violent and destroyed property and lives.
This message was deleted by its author.
First you'd need to actually formally charge him.. then convict him of the charges otherwise it's a moot concept
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Would have needed a coup. There wasn't one.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@MasterLee the Constitution doesn't require that the coup be successful.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
Proof or it didn't happen and by proof I don't mean demoncrap yapping points.
Thanks for the BC
TexChik · F
Good luck with that.
carpediem · 61-69, M
Troll account
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
The United States decided not to bother with the leaders of the insurrection. Too much work.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
Unfortunately, he would have to be convicted.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@LordShadowfire Merrick Garland is a moderate, so I guess Trump is above the law.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@Stereoguy really? Which part of the Constitution seems to encourage insurrection?