Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Jane’s Revenge Terrorists Post Letter Threatening Pro-Life Organizations Nationwide

"Your thirty days expired yesterday. We offered an honourable way out. You could have walked away. Now the leash is off. And we will make it as hard as possible for your campaign of oppression to continue. We have demonstrated in the past month how easy and fun it is to attack. We are versatile, we are mercurial, and we answer to no one but ourselves. We promised to take increasingly drastic measures against oppressive infrastructures. Rest assured that we will, and those measures may not come in the form of something so easily cleaned up as fire and graffiti. Sometimes you will see what we do, and you will know that it is us. Sometimes you will think you merely are unlucky, because you cannot see the ways which we interfere in your affairs. But your pointless attempts to control others, and make life more difficult, will not be met passively. Eventually your insurance companies, and your financial backers will realize you are a bad investment.

From here forward, any anti-choice group who closes their doors, and stops operating will no longer be a target. But until you do, it’s open season, and we know where your operations are. The infrastructure of the enslavers will not survive. We will never stop, back down, slow down, or retreat. We did not want this; but it is upon us, and so we must deal with it proportionally. We exist in confluence and solidarity with all others in the struggle for complete liberation. Our recourse now is to defend ourselves and to build robust, caring communities of mutual aid, so that we may heal ourselves without the need of the medical industry or any other intermediary. Through attacking, we find joy, courage, and strip the veneer of impenetrability held by these violent institutions."

And the department of injustice, with it's puppet master meritless garland, is busy collecting data on parents who dare complain at school board meetings and labeling them domestic terrorists
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Lila15 · 22-25, F
What do you think of that group that was just arrested in Idaho on the way to disrupt a Pride event?
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Lila15 Oh look! It's strawgirl and her attempt to disrupt the discussion with a purity test.
dakotaviper · 56-60, M
@Lila15 well it's illegal for them to do what they were planning. But Jane's Revenge is part of the Propaganda Machine of the Democrat Party of the USA. Remember, Democrats can do whatever they want without any fear of being held responsible for their actions. It's the rest of us that must obey the Law.
Carazaa · F
@Lila15
[quote]
What do you think of that group that was just arrested in Idaho on the way to disrupt a Pride event?[/quote]

You know the same type of gun loving violent murderers who call themselves Christian Nationalists and feel it is their duty to enforce "Law and Order" by killing anyone who is a sinner. But they forgot Jesus verse "do not judge or you will be judged" so they were arrested because they were doing just that, disrupting"Law and Order"...
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@SumKindaMunster I guess I put you in an uncomfortable position, where you have to decide if you're going to publicly support PRIDE or Nazis.
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@dakotaviper "Jane's Revenge" doesn't actually exist beyond just a few people who disrupted a few church services. But fine, if you catch any of them, charge them.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Lila15 Not at all, I'm not affected by your strawman arguments and attempts to hijack the discussion. 😘

It's typical of you to think that some regurgitated question that has nothing to do with the subject being discussed would make me uncomfortable.

That's just silly, I see through you like a freshly squeegeed window pane. I smile at your pathetic and desperate attempts at gotcha! questions. 😆
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@SumKindaMunster Got it, you're ashamed to answer.

The discussion is about politically-motivated violence. It's interesting that you think bringing up violence from your side is "hijacking the discussion." Right-wing violence vastly exceeds both left-wing and Islamic violence combined. But that doesn't concern you because you saw a few nights of rioting after George Floyd was killed and that's all that matters to you.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Lila15 [quote]Got it, you're ashamed to answer.[/quote]

Not at all, but I noted your desperate attempt to yet again change the subject.

[quote]The discussion is about politically-motivated violence[/quote]

No, the subject is Jane's Revenge, as I mentioned when I engaged you, you chose to change the subject into a "purity test" as you typically do when you aren't comfortable discussing the issue at hand.

[quote]Right-wing violence vastly exceeds both left-wing and Islamic violence combined. But that doesn't concern you because you saw a few nights of rioting after George Floyd was killed and that's all that matters to you.
[/quote]

Believe what you wish, we both know you aren't speaking in a genuine and sincere manner.
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@SumKindaMunster "Jane's Revenge" is insignificant. However, anyone engaging in violence in the cause of abortion rights should be prosecuted, and if there is an actual leadership of that group, they should be prosecuted as well if it can be shown that they encouraged their members to engage in violence.

Now that I've made that clear, would you hold the perpetrators of Jan. 6 to the same standard? Or that's "changing the subject?"

I'm basing my views on the statistics. If you have statistics showing the opposite, please post them. Although you've said that you don't believe in providing citations, so I won't hold my breath. I'm not ashamed of my sources, so here you go. This is from the Washington Post, so I'm sure you'll dismiss it as "left-wing propaganda."
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Lila15 LOL, ignoring those over 750 "mostly peaceful protests" again?
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@sunsporter1649 They were "mostly peaceful" if you discount the violence from right-wingers and cops.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Lila15 [quote]Now that I've made that clear, would you hold the perpetrators of Jan. 6 to the same standard? Or that's "changing the subject?"[/quote]

Yes, that's changing the subject. Not sure why I have to explain that to you, should be obvious.
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@SumKindaMunster Got it. We're only allowed to discuss "Jane's Revenge."

Can you provide information on how many people are in this group, who is financing them, and how one would go about joining them? Their website appears to be nothing more than a blog listing attacks they're taking responsibility for. "Joining" the group may require little beyond defacing a CPC and attributing it to them.

This sounds like a very dangerous organization, so I hope the FBI moves resources from things like investigating organized crime, terrorism, human sex trafficking, etc. to focus on this new menace.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Lila15 You can discuss whatever you want. I've already made my opinion of your disingenuous debating style known, and you are either too dim or too stubborn to accept that feedback.

Anything else?
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@SumKindaMunster Why should I accept your "feedback" when it's not in good faith? You're not here to debate, you just want to preen and show off how smart you are.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Lila15 My feedback was in good faith. My observations were sincere, and I explained to you why, with specific reasons
, I am not responding to you relevantly.

I think you are projecting.