Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Border States Need To Override Biden And Secure Their Own Borders


The border crisis constitutes as an invasion, threatening the safety, security, and prosperity of the American people, and states have the right to respond.

The Biden administration’s commitment to dismantling southern border protections and Trump-era policies, most recently Title 42, has exacerbated the devastating border crisis. Last March, 172,331 illegal immigrants were encountered by Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This April, CBP encountered a staggering 221,303 illegal immigrants on the southern border, reaching an unprecedented 1.06 million encounters for the first half of the 2022 fiscal year. DHS released 80,000 of those migrants into the interior of the United States.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Why not- it was done for Covid, wasn’t it? States effectively took it upon themselves to deal with that “ crisis” as their border(s) We have an illegal population “ crisis”, and let the states deal with it as they deem appropriate.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@soar2newhighs because the US signed international treaties that make this illegal.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Changeisgonnacome
the US signed international treaties that make this illegal

You keep saying that.
It isn't true.
There's no treaty dictating that we need to let untold numbers of illegals into the country.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Budwick the treaties merely codified certain human rights, you have excuses to ignore the laws, especially in Texas. Nobody expected anything else from a nation that admits to being lawless.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Changeisgonnacome So, no treaties.

What else you got?
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Budwick code 1158 is the US law that codified the right to enter the US any time to seek asylum. It follows from treaty laws you can always break freely. But it's not my responsibility to tell any adults the laws that made the border patrol illegal. They're criminals, education does not change the narrative of murderers in this case.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Budwick nobody thinks that Americans would admit to anything that stopped them from killing. No laws could ever apply. You convince us all.
@Changeisgonnacome Please reference said treaty/,treaties. I will gladly look at them.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Changeisgonnacome Ahh - asylum.

Well, there's Title 42 - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that Title 42 is not an immigration control tool but a public health order, but that it “will comply with the court’s order to continue enforcing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Title 42 Order as long as it remains in place.”

So, stay the fuck out!
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Budwick whatever you like-. Nobody cares any more about your excuses.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Changeisgonnacome
Nobody cares any more about your excuses.

OK then. See ya!
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Budwick you should definitely leave the conversation. It's an existential threat-. The conservatism.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Changeisgonnacome
you should definitely leave the conversation.

Uhm - it's MY post Sparky!
@Changeisgonnacome so you’re saying some international treaties (which you need to produce so you can validate your statement)have dominion over our states?
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@soar2newhighs produce the UN declaration of human rights for yourself and deny it exists again.
US also codified the rights, and title 42 is illegal, it's also meant to fight the replacement invaders. Embarrassing for some Americans.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@soar2newhighs as I said above feeder code 1158 codified the right to asylum.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Changeisgonnacome
title 42 is illegal

Says who?
@Changeisgonnacome Be careful what you post, “ replacement invaders”? That could offend many and be considered racist,
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Budwick feeder code 1158, the UN charter-. The thing is, conservatives don't want any rights to move across borders, that way they can grant Visa's from their corporate, and control who gets to be international at all.
@Changeisgonnacome Apparently the courts do not see title 42 as illegal.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@soar2newhighs and yet you were the one saying we legally barred entry-. No other reason for doing it, really. Containing covid was always wrong, even for China, except for border vigilantes.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Changeisgonnacome
conservatives don't want any rights to move across borders

I see the confusion.
No, it's illegal citizens we have a problem with.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Budwick you try to create confusion.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Changeisgonnacome Just responding to you lame, incomplete and untrue statements.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@Budwick yes, your response is on me. Typical. The issue is important, but you are always on me.
@Changeisgonnacome
[image/video deleted]