Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Poll - Total Votes: 33
State Militias
Personal Protection
Show Results
You may vote on multiple answers.
Is it about protecting regulated state militias or personal protection?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
jehova · 31-35, M
I appreciate your perspective. given the size of the U.S. military, an armed militia isn't necessary that's also what the national guard is. Your right to bear arms wouldn't be infringed. Only safety, training, and operation instructions forced to be included, maybe classes. A delay in availability will provide enough time to reduce impulsive follow through. Protecting your right to having a weapon is not conditional based on how long you have to wait; and ensuring safe use of any all weapons while keeping the public safe is personal protection. Thinking of citizens as both investment in and liable property of This great nation,.