Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Poll - Total Votes: 33
State Militias
Personal Protection
Show Results
You may vote on multiple answers.
Is it about protecting regulated state militias or personal protection?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Both.. they go hand in hand.. that was the intent.. the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms.. SHALL NOT be infringed.
4meAndyou · F
@Onestarlitnight Best comment!!! 👆
DailyFlash · 56-60, M
@4meAndyou isn’t it because in the state militias they furnished their own guns?
4meAndyou · F
@DailyFlash In the old days, yes, they did. Imagine every able bodied man or woman being called up by their governor to defend their state...in the early days of our country, we didn't always have state money to pay to arm the National Guard.

But it's even more important, with all this defund the police nonsense, and with all the unknown elements streaming across our southern border, for each family to be able to protect themselves from break ins and thieves.