This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Did he really go there again?
I guess it fits the profile, but he's really making a case for the idea that he's in it only for himself.
I guess it fits the profile, but he's really making a case for the idea that he's in it only for himself.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@MistyCee Yeah, but Bonnie and Clyde and Robin Hood, and even Ted Bundy were not so obvious they were really only interested in their self-interests. This (fake) bone spur is transparent about his self-absorption, it's clear he holds private disdain for his most enthusiastic supporters, and that he would be just as happy to have them suffer if they can take up his grievances on his say-so.
He may be a run-of-the-mill conman, but the cult-like obsession he still enjoys among 30% of the population is still surprising.
He may be a run-of-the-mill conman, but the cult-like obsession he still enjoys among 30% of the population is still surprising.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@MistyCee 25-30% is lemming. Of that though, there is a 10 - 12% that feels that fat, slimy slob is not extremist enough. They want anti-vaccine messages; they want women back in the kitchen. They genuinely want autocracy that has no resemblance to American ideals. And, that segment is primed to be picked off by anyone who incites them to take up arms.
@MarkPaul Hmm. I think you're underselling the numbers of folks who want to see either real or economic bloodshed a bit, tbh, and I'd put a lot of them, as well as the lemmings into the autocracy crowd, because, why do folks
"genuinely" want an autocracy or why do they want women barefoot and pregnant, or at least with fewer options then to let their pussy get grabbed?
"genuinely" want an autocracy or why do they want women barefoot and pregnant, or at least with fewer options then to let their pussy get grabbed?