This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Jonjdw · 51-55, M
Dems are pro choice. We will see what happens. There will be trouble
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@Jonjdw Not when it comes to vaccines.
Jonjdw · 51-55, M
@MrBrownstone republicans get vaccinated too.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@Jonjdw What’s that got to do with pro-choice?
Jonjdw · 51-55, M
@MrBrownstone maybe nothing. Still what came to my mind.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@MrBrownstone 🥱
I really wonder if you understand how dumb that argument is by thinking this through. Because a large part of the "pro-life" crowd refused to wear a mouthmask, moaned about covid regulation and even talked about their bodily autonomy when it comes to the vaccine during an actual health crisis that killed a lot of actual living breathing people. And those same "my bodily autonomy people" that also label themselves "pro life" are now hyper concerned about women making the free choice on what they do with their bodies. And the only death that comes from it in the current laws, is a bunch of cells that has no signs of conciousness because that part of the brain hasn't been developed yet. To make it short... your argument cut both ways, but on one side of the blade actual living people are dieing and in the other we just have a life that isn't even in the development of conciousness yet. But hey, you just keep parotting what people spooned in and your simple brain perceived as a good argument. Djezes fuck.
I really wonder if you understand how dumb that argument is by thinking this through. Because a large part of the "pro-life" crowd refused to wear a mouthmask, moaned about covid regulation and even talked about their bodily autonomy when it comes to the vaccine during an actual health crisis that killed a lot of actual living breathing people. And those same "my bodily autonomy people" that also label themselves "pro life" are now hyper concerned about women making the free choice on what they do with their bodies. And the only death that comes from it in the current laws, is a bunch of cells that has no signs of conciousness because that part of the brain hasn't been developed yet. To make it short... your argument cut both ways, but on one side of the blade actual living people are dieing and in the other we just have a life that isn't even in the development of conciousness yet. But hey, you just keep parotting what people spooned in and your simple brain perceived as a good argument. Djezes fuck.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@Kwek00 I’m talking about pro-choice.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@MrBrownstone You didn't get it do you... or you are incapable of getting it because it needs selfreflection into the tribe that you have attached yourself too. And the tribe you are in right now, is notoriously bad at selfreflection or selfcriticism.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@Kwek00 Nope. I’m talking about pro-choice. You went on about pro-life.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@MrBrownstone I went on about both. Do you know why? Because your remark cuts both ways. It's like a fat guy mocking another fat guy that he's fat.And when you point it out, the fat guy goes: "I was talking about that fat guy, you don't have to make it about me".
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@Kwek00 Pro-choice and pro-life are different. You must be a fucking idiot
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@MrBrownstone I said that a lot of those pro-life people, during the covid pandemic, refused to wear a mask, refused to social distance and refused the vaccine. And what was their argument? Their argument was that they had bodily autonomy, some of them claimed religious rights and of course they wanted freedom. Even though their behavior threatened other people, and a lot of people have died since then. But the argument... "bodily autonomy".
Now today, a huge part of those pro-life clique (because the overlap is really big) claim that women don't have bodily autonomy. And what are they saving Browstone? They are saving a bunch of cells that eventually will grow out to become a human being. And why is that? Because the rules right now only count up to the 3th trimester. At that point, there is no brain activity that suggest conciousness. But that is incredibly important to them, while no one cared about life that lives, breaths and walks around during the COVID crisis, when they didn't want to take a vaccine because they demanded the right to bodily autonomy.
Same argument, diffrent context, seriously diffrent outcome.
Freedom for us, law and order for the rest.
Now today, a huge part of those pro-life clique (because the overlap is really big) claim that women don't have bodily autonomy. And what are they saving Browstone? They are saving a bunch of cells that eventually will grow out to become a human being. And why is that? Because the rules right now only count up to the 3th trimester. At that point, there is no brain activity that suggest conciousness. But that is incredibly important to them, while no one cared about life that lives, breaths and walks around during the COVID crisis, when they didn't want to take a vaccine because they demanded the right to bodily autonomy.
Same argument, diffrent context, seriously diffrent outcome.
Freedom for us, law and order for the rest.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment