Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Sexism by the numbers

• 84% of lawmakers who sponsored state "trigger laws" banning abortion are men.

• The laws had zero women sponsors in five states; 12 of the 13 governors who signed them into law are men.

• 91% of US senators who voted to confirm Supreme Court justices in the anti-Roe majority are men.

• A total of 380 state legislators served as lead sponsor or cosponsor of abortion bans in 13 states that take effect as soon as the high court overturns the landmark decision. They're predominantly men, too — 84%.

• In fact, five of these so-called "trigger laws" — in Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Tennessee — had zero women sponsors or co-sponsors. Of the 13 governors who signed them into law, 12 are Republican men. Yet the language in these laws specifically targets women.

The vast majority of political players behind these bans were also Republicans, including 86% of bill sponsors. All of the anti-Roe justices were nominated by Republican men and 94% of the senators who voted to confirm the justices were Republican.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/behind-a-looming-wave-of-state-abortion-bans-there-are-a-lot-of-men/ar-AAX6V1g?rt=1&ocid=Win10NewsApp&referrerID=InAppShare

Defend this.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
hartfire · 61-69
I couldn't and wouldn't defend it.

I think the answer is to legislate for in favour of mandated proportional representation. When 50% of all elected representatives are women, the culture will start to become fairer to women.

I don't know how one would legislate for racial fairness -- even though I see it as absolutely necessary. If 13% of the US identifies as Black American then that could make them a minority that never achieves full democratic equality. Similar issues would apply for Native Americans, Hispanics and migrant groups.

Also, racial numbers could change over time, based on some having far more children as part or their religious or cultural beliefs. This comes at a time when world overpopulation is one of the three biggest factors driving global warming. How does one encourage all families to have no more than 2 kids without cries of religious discrimination and racial accusations of eugenics?