Politics & News

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I anxiously await any and all evidence from Republicans of voter fraud.

Please present your evidence, if any, in the comments below.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

I’m not sure all these are still good but you can start here.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/01/did_over_100000_people_older_than_124_years_vote_in_wisconsin.html

https://elections.wi.gov/node/7516

https://youtu.be/t75xvZ3osFg

https://granitegrok.com/blog/2022/01/more-on-how-the-2020-election-was-rigged

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/list-10-ways-2020-presidential-election-stolen/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/exclusive-election-fraud-video-maricopa-county-election-workers-caught-red-handed-deleting-archived-files-server-delivery-auditors/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/exclusive-currently-5-million-invalid-ballots-identified-2020-election-pennsylvania-georgia-arizona-validating-trump-won/

https://www.wnd.com/2022/02/confirmed-200000-ballots-2020-counted-mismatched-signatures/

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/georgia-elections-chief-finds-more-2000-suspected-foreigners-states-voter

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/breaking-wisconsin-special-counsel-michael-gableman-calls-decertification-wisconsin-2020-election-results/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/boom-wisconsin-special-counsel-implicates-obama-campaign-manager-david-plouffe-erics-david-becker-wisconsin-election-fraud-investigation/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/zuckerbucks-work-91-nursing-homes-5-wisconsin-cities-95-100-voter-turnout-rates/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/huge-following-wisconsin-justice-gablemans-explosive-testimony-democrat-election-fraud-amistad-project-ties-zuckerbucks-nursing-home-voter-fraud/

https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/25-big-questions-that-democrats-cant?s=r

CorvusBlackthorne · M

@redredred I don't recognize YouTube videos as evidence. I am unfamiliar with those other publications, so I will give it one chance her newspaper. If I detect a hint of bias, I will dismiss all of them.

Update: The Gateway Pundit appears to post nothing but opinion pieces with quotes from Twitter users as so-called evidence. I shall keep you posted as to whether I find the rest of your sources to be honest in the slightest.

Second update: Your allegedly hard-hitting article in the Emerald has not a word of truth to it, and calling it an opinion piece would be ridiculously flattering.

Third update: The article from WND sounds legitimate, but there is the troubling fact that they also print absolute outright lies about abortion and other topics. I'm afraid I cannot trust them.

Fourth update: The so-called smoking gun in your link to the Wisconsin election board is fully explained and debunked in the same article. Did you even read it?

Fifth update: The American Thinker is terribly misnamed. I've half a mind to purchase it and rename it [i]The Daily Indoctrinator[/i].

Final update: Granite Grok is aptly named. The author has a mind made of stone.

redredred · M

@CorvusBlackthorne Of course you will…
“There are none so blind…”

Onestarlitnight

@CorvusBlackthorne
Hahaha..
In other words NO evidence will EVER convince you.. PERIOD .

LMFAO...😂😂😂

CorvusBlackthorne · M

@Onestarlitnight All it takes is one shred of evidence from an unbiased source. @redredred refuses to provide such evidence.

Onestarlitnight

@CorvusBlackthorne
You wouldn't accept any evidence regardless of the source..
Nobody would be credible.

IF... evidence existed

redredred · M

@CorvusBlackthorne I gave you about 20 but then you started waffling about your perceived bias. I don’t give a fuck what you believe but it’s undeniable there’s plenty of evidence you’re just too fucking pig-headed to admit it.

And nobody cares.

redredred · M

@Onestarlitnight could I have that in English

CorvusBlackthorne · M

@redredred You gave me one YouTube link, several opinion pieces from highly biased sources, and one article from the Wisconsin election board which explains the seeming inequity without requiring this silly conspiracy of yours. In other words, dear fellow, you have failed.

redredred · M

@CorvusBlackthorne And you asked for one shred. Then you started waffling.

CorvusBlackthorne · M

@redredred I asked you for one single article from an unbiased source. You were unable to do so. All of those so-called journalistic sources were written by people who began at the conclusion, then rearranged the facts to support it.

Lila15 · 22-25, F

@redredred You should have turned that evidence over to Trump’s legal team.

redredred · M

@CorvusBlackthorne you wrote ”any and all evidence from Republicans”. I understand that evidence from democrats would be worthless but I supplied what you asked for. It’s right there at the top of this string. Your words.

CorvusBlackthorne · M

@redredred I did not think you would provide articles from such obviously biased sources. I assumed you had far more common sense than that. Clearly, I needed to be much more transparent.

CorvusBlackthorne · M

@redredred I do appreciate that you made the attempt, however.

redredred · M

@CorvusBlackthorne I fulfilled your request just as you wrote it. You’re waffling again.

CorvusBlackthorne · M

@redredred I daresay you have no idea what that word means, just as you have no idea what constitutes an unbiased article.

markansas

@redredred [image deleted]Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/

Burnley123 · 41-45, M

@Onestarlitnight [quote]You wouldn't accept any evidence regardless of the source..
Nobody would be credible.

IF... evidence existed
[/quote]

If a tree doesn't fall in a forest and nobody is around to hear it, would they hear it if it did actually fall?

Burnley123 · 41-45, M

@redredred [quote]”any and all evidence from Republicans”. I understand that evidence from democrats would be worthless but I supplied what you asked for. It’s right there at the top of this string. Your words.
[/quote]

To count as any evidence, it has to actually be evidence. A jury may want to a agree with a discredited compulsive liar but it wouldn't be good legal practice.

Anyone can say anything and put it on the internet. Anyone can read it and anyone (if they are willfully gullible enough) can tell someone else that it counts as evidence.

redredred · M

@Burnley123 You should school yourself on the distinction between evidence and proof. What you’re looking for is defined as proof, I presented evidence in exact accord with what the poster asked for.

redredred · M

@markansas

walt82 · 80-89, M

@redredred I've read a few of the links you've posted, thank you. Most are interesting, a few appear to be staged and a few certainly would lead a person to strongly suspect some sort of foul play. But, as someone posted (maybe you) evidence is not proof. As I understand the law, in cases like this the courts ask the plaintiffs for proof to support their suit as do election officials investigating voter fraud. And it's my understanding that all the folks who are tasked with guaranteeing fair elections have found no proof of stealing, tampering or any other illegal activity related to the 2020 election.

What I might conclude is compelling evidence of fraud after watching a YouTube video or reading someone's blog would never be considered proof in a court of law or in an official investigation.