Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A Handbook for Genocide.

Russia has just issued a genocide handbook for its war on Ukraine. The Russian official press agency "RIA Novosti" published last Sunday an explicit program for the complete elimination of the Ukrainian nation as such. It is still available for viewing, and has now been translated several times into English.

(https://medium.com/@kravchenko_mm/what-should-russia-do-with-ukraine-translation-of-a-propaganda-article-by-a-russian-journalist-a3e92e3cb64)

A "Nazi," as the genocide manual explains, is simply a human being who self-identifies as Ukrainian. According to the handbook, the establishment of a Ukrainian state thirty years ago was the "nazification of Ukraine." Indeed "any attempt to build such a state" has to be a "Nazi" act. Ukrainians are "Nazis" because they fail to accept "the necessity that the people support Russia."

For anyone still out there who believes that Putin's Russia opposes the extreme right in Ukraine or anywhere else, the genocide program is a chance to reconsider. Putin's Russian regime talks of “Nazis” not because it opposes the extreme right, which it most certainly does not, but as a rhetorical device to justify unprovoked war and genocidal policies. Putin’s regime is the extreme right. It is the world center of fascism. It supports fascists and extreme-right authoritarians around the world. In traducing the meaning of words like "Nazi," Putin and his propagandists are creating more rhetorical and political space for fascists in Russia and elsewhere.

The genocide handbook explains that the Russian policy of "denazification" is not directed against Nazis in the sense that the word is normally used. The handbook grants, with no hesitation, that there is no evidence that Nazism, as generally understood, is important in Ukraine. It operates within the special Russian definition of "Nazi": a Nazi is a Ukrainian who refuses to admit being a Russian. The "Nazism" in question is "amorphous and ambivalent"; one must, for example, be able to see beneath the world of appearance and decode the affinity for Ukrainian culture or for the European Union as "Nazism."
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Well, I'm all for genocide of all Trump supporters. I think it would actually make America great again.
@independentone America has never been an autocracy before, thats a blanton lie.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@Angelogaggi Harsh is the only thing Trumpists understand.
@checkoutanytime Trump sure attempted to make it one though.
@independentone by cutting out the parris accord that no nation even trys to adhere to, doesn't equal what you suggest, by any means, you actually paint yourself as a typical bigoted democrat.
@checkoutanytime What are you ranting about? You sound like a complete lunatic.
Trump was all for jailing anyone who opposed him. Trump is the only POTUS in history to openly admire dictators like Putin and so many others.
@independentone you asked for genocide of fellow Americans, you are a racist bigot piece of filth, shut up already , nobody believes your a good person.
@checkoutanytime Trump supporters are traitors, shouldn't be considered Americans
@independentone you watch way too much cnn dude
@checkoutanytime some CNN, some FOX, more Reuters and BBC for me. I try to get all sides.
@independentone i read my info from all angles myself, is what shocks me the hate you have.
@checkoutanytime Yeah, I know, today it's over the top, but I really don't care for the Trump supporters. This steal the election garbage just looks to me like a bunch of crybabies who can't stand that they lost.
@independentone the thing is mail in votes, that states allowed less then six months before the election, compounded with Facebook, Twitter, and cnn ganging up on supporting executive orders over constitutional law, which results in Noone actually lying.
@checkoutanytime I've been voting by mail for a decade now, nothing wrong or illegal about it.
Facebook and Twitter are opinion sites, so people can support or oppose any political party, much like SW is.
The problem with executive orders, is they are not law, and the next POTUS can end them any time.
@independentone around here it was unlawful until june 2020, only military and disabled were permitted.
@checkoutanytime So, what is your problem with voting by mail? If it is safe for military and disabled, why not for everyone?
@independentone its not difficult to trace military or disabled people they are a small portion, to identify their authentication, to trace every mail in vote for authentication and individuality would take an army, and years of research to prove they are authentic, especially with George Soros active in our democracy, its become a battle of honesty over espionage, thats not riddlie idendentifiable from the opening bell, which circles me back to the most bezare election sequence ive ever seen, in the wayning hours pathetic Joe Biden the zero comes from behind to win in a landslide at the closing bell. Something strange is going on, i can smell it.
@checkoutanytime Well, when you have proof, let me know, or better yet, submit your proof to the courts.
@independentone look at your own words, "death to America " you sir are an extremist, in the eyes of law.
@checkoutanytime I don't consider Trumpist Americans, I consider them traitors. How does that make me an extremist?
why do you support traitors? Why do you think it is ok to attempt to take over the Capitol and hang the Vice President of the United States?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@independentone I reported this comment. You're appalling.
@SumKindaMunster Guess you don't believe in free speech, you commie
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@independentone You're welcome to say whatever you want. Free speech isn't speech without consequences however. You're really going to defend a call for the genocide of millions of American citizens?

Also, who the fuck would heart this comment? For shame.
Strictgram · 70-79, C
@independentone Terroristic threats are not protected free speech. Rather they are chargeable offenses.