Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I see another post by a homophobic christian. She's entitled to her beliefs, isn't she?

It's really not surprising how many Christians are homophobic and anti-BLM. That was a huge thing that made me realize how NOT Jesus-like Christianity is.

It’s no coincidence that the ex-vangelical and Christian deconstruction movement happened at the same time as the movement for Black lives. Christian Supremacy is such a huge source of injustice in the US. One of the most important aspects of my own anti-racism journey started with deconstructing the Christian faith that I was raised in.

This is controversial because Christian supremacist ideology is really pervasive in Black churches too. They don't like the racist parts but they do embrace the homophobia and sexism. And they don't see how it's all related.

When you think beyond White supremacy to see that's it's just one part of the umbrella of Christian supremacy, it's really a game-changer. Christian Supremacy is multiple forms of oppression and Supremacy, all wrapped into one.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
The modern anti-abortion movement in the U.S. was started by racists like Jerry Falwell, when he realized that opposing integration was becoming unpopular. So he pivoted to opposing abortion and gay rights. Falwell and other segregationists were the ideological heirs of the supporters of Jim Crow and slavery. You can draw a straight line through them to the present day.

I'm not saying all Christians are bad or that Christianity is responsible for these evils. After all, Martin Luther King Jr. was a Christian minister, and some of the greatest fighters for social justice in the U.S. were Christians going back to the abolitionists. But conservative Christianity more often than not has been a force for evil.
@LeopoldBloom You in support of Maryland’s proposed abortion bill not about pre birth, but basically killing by neglect, infants after birth.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@soar2newhighs I tried looking your claim up and got a bunch of Christian sites. The one site I found which wasn't biased didn't claim any of that. What the bill would do is cover expenses and help protect abortion rights even if the Supreme Court votes against abortion is what I hear.

Got a link to a fair site?

https://marylandreporter.com/2022/03/09/maryland-considers-legislation-to-protect-expand-abortion-care-as-supreme-court-decision-looms/
@soar2newhighs That's not what that law says, you lying piece of shit. Now go back to jacking off to videos of bombs being dropped on brown children.
@soar2newhighs Also, I thought you people had no problem neglecting kids after birth. Whenever one of us mentions things like child care or health care or other social welfare benefits to help women keep their babies instead of aborting them, you scream "socialism" and "not my problem." So shut the fuck up about your imaginary law allowing infants to be neglected because you're totally in favor of that.
@LeopoldBloom Got under your skin, did I?
@soar2newhighs Yes. I tend to be annoyed by Nazi misogynists like you who view children as instruments of discipline to punish women for having sex.

Just imagine that the kids you think are being killed under the Maryland law are Black and you'll be fine.
@LeopoldBloom You need to relax and think before you respond with strange metaphors. And you paint with a broad brush with your responses. You do not come across as rational but more as an angry person who lashes out. You disagree with me ? That’s fine because we agree to disagree.
@soar2newhighs I'm disagreeing because your view of the Maryland law is wrong. It doesn't allow doctors to kill babies after they're born. Although I'm surprised you wouldn't support that.
@LeopoldBloom You’re entitled to disagree with my view.
@soar2newhighs
Has more rights than its mother:

Collateral damage:
@LeopoldBloom That’s your view- ok.
@soar2newhighs No, that's the conservative view. My view is the rights of people who are already born take precedence, and forcing a woman to give birth against her will is no different than forcing her to pick your cotton without paying her. Forced birth is slavery.
@LeopoldBloom ok, like you say, your view.
@soar2newhighs It's my view that that's the conservative view? OK.