Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why is the plight of the Ukrainian people seeming more important than that of the Kurds, Palestinians or Yemeni people?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
room101 · 51-55, M
"Seeming" is the operative word here.

When the war in Syria began in 2011, the news feeds here in Europe broadcast it 24/7. They showed the refugee camps, they talked about the Yazidi genocide. They covered the resistance by Kurdish forces and the casualties that they sustained as a consequence. The coverage continued for quite a few years.

Similarly with Palestine. Every time there is another attack, the news here in Europe is inundated with it.

Admittedly, coverage of Yemen has been sparse. But is that because "white's don't care about people of colour" or, is it because having the word "PRESS" displayed in Yemen is akin to painting the proverbial target on oneself?
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
@room101 Not to mention Karabakh from not even 2 years ago. It was covered pretty well too.
room101 · 51-55, M
@CrazyMusicLover And Myanmar. And Sudan. I'm old enough to remember Rawanda too😉
@room101 what is happening now seems bigger
room101 · 51-55, M
@TheDeathOfOzymandiaz It is bigger. As @Elessar has already pointed out, this is the only time that the leader on one side of a given conflict has threatened to use nuclear weapons against anybody that interferes.
@room101 Show me that?
room101 · 51-55, M
@TheDeathOfOzymandiaz

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/27/vladimir-putin-puts-russia-nuclear-deterrence-forces-on-high-alert-ukraine

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/3/how-realistic-is-vladimir-putins-nuclear-threat

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/putin-ukraine-nato-nuclear-weapons-1.6362890

There are plenty of other online news articles covering this topic. I've chosen three that a) don't require subscription and b) cover a global perspective and audience.