Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why exactly do the liberals who are ignorant of WWII history think the Nazis believed "white people" were his idea of a superior race?

I don't understand why some of the most vocal liberals always use the term "white people" when referring to the type of people Hitler thought were superior.

His #1 enemies that he wanted to commit a genocide against were Jews and Slavs. Both of which are considered "white people" by the standard of whiteness that exists in American racism. Slavs may be disadvantaged in Europe, but theyre white in America. Same goes for Jews.

Hitler may have viewed the so-called "Aryan people" (What he really meant was Germanic people) as being the most superior, but.... since when are they the only white people on the planet?

His #1 victims, like I previously stated, were Slavs and Jews. Both of which are white. Further proving the claim that "The Nazis ideology were about preserving the white race" is just factually incorrect.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
People take that position because it is factual. In the context of the time Slavs,Jews, and even most of Southern Europe were not considered "white."


It is bizarre that people who clearly don't understand high school level history lecture others on not understanding history.
MickRogers · 26-30, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow That position isn't factual though, and not a single historian on the planet actually agrees with you.

Whether or not Jews and Slavs were "considered white" at the time has no relevance to the point. Hitler's fascination wasn't towards white people, it was towards Germanic people. The point being, Jews and Slavs are white-appearing. They have white skin. Meaning Hitler's fascination wasn't towards "white people" but a specific type of white people.

Not even a single place in Mein Kampf did Hitler even claim he advocated for preserving "white people" but of thr Aryan race. Meaning your claim is, by definition, ahistorical.
@MickRogers Ummm citation needed.


Sorry but this has been the standard position of historians and political science experts for almost a hundred years.


This revisionist BS is mostly just BS you find on the Daily Stormer.


Whether or not Jews and Slavs were "considered white" at the time has no relevance to the point. Hitler's fascination wasn't towards white people

Sorry but that is not factual, but it is moving the goalposts 80 years after the fact.



The point being, Jews and Slavs are white-appearing. They have white skin


Now that point is totally irrelevant. The nazis considered both to be inferior sub races.


You are trying desperately to strip away historical context and reinvent definitions after the point which raises some pretty ugly questions.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow The Irish didn't become White until they moved to America.