This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
People take that position because it is factual. In the context of the time Slavs,Jews, and even most of Southern Europe were not considered "white."
It is bizarre that people who clearly don't understand high school level history lecture others on not understanding history.
It is bizarre that people who clearly don't understand high school level history lecture others on not understanding history.
MickRogers · 26-30, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow That position isn't factual though, and not a single historian on the planet actually agrees with you.
Whether or not Jews and Slavs were "considered white" at the time has no relevance to the point. Hitler's fascination wasn't towards white people, it was towards Germanic people. The point being, Jews and Slavs are white-appearing. They have white skin. Meaning Hitler's fascination wasn't towards "white people" but a specific type of white people.
Not even a single place in Mein Kampf did Hitler even claim he advocated for preserving "white people" but of thr Aryan race. Meaning your claim is, by definition, ahistorical.
Whether or not Jews and Slavs were "considered white" at the time has no relevance to the point. Hitler's fascination wasn't towards white people, it was towards Germanic people. The point being, Jews and Slavs are white-appearing. They have white skin. Meaning Hitler's fascination wasn't towards "white people" but a specific type of white people.
Not even a single place in Mein Kampf did Hitler even claim he advocated for preserving "white people" but of thr Aryan race. Meaning your claim is, by definition, ahistorical.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@MickRogers Ummm citation needed.
Sorry but this has been the standard position of historians and political science experts for almost a hundred years.
This revisionist BS is mostly just BS you find on the Daily Stormer.
Sorry but that is not factual, but it is moving the goalposts 80 years after the fact.
Now that point is totally irrelevant. The nazis considered both to be inferior sub races.
You are trying desperately to strip away historical context and reinvent definitions after the point which raises some pretty ugly questions.
Sorry but this has been the standard position of historians and political science experts for almost a hundred years.
This revisionist BS is mostly just BS you find on the Daily Stormer.
Whether or not Jews and Slavs were "considered white" at the time has no relevance to the point. Hitler's fascination wasn't towards white people
Sorry but that is not factual, but it is moving the goalposts 80 years after the fact.
The point being, Jews and Slavs are white-appearing. They have white skin
Now that point is totally irrelevant. The nazis considered both to be inferior sub races.
You are trying desperately to strip away historical context and reinvent definitions after the point which raises some pretty ugly questions.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow The Irish didn't become White until they moved to America.