Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

America is wrong about Ukraine

What is happening in Ukraine? Before diving into the events unfolding on the borderlands of Europe, let’s jump past some basic concerns I have about even writing this article. If you were to speak with a man who existed in hypocrisy like a fish exists in water, how often would you care to bring up the Golden Rule? At what point, after witnessing so many sociopathic forays, would you accept the futility of once again voicing calls for fairness?

The United States, in its current state, is the material embodiment of paranoia. Since World War 2, as if driven to madness by the nuclear waste infused blood on our hands, no stone is too small to risk remaining upturned. When September 11th happened, as is often true of the relationship between trauma and comorbidities, our already severe pathology became a terminal illness.

Paid for with our very future, this once revolutionary republic has dragged itself through every mud-drenched, sun scarred hellscape under the stars, all in a fear-drunk hope of catching a glance at the incoming punch we believe to be promised by karma.

And when every dollar was spent and ever pebble inspected, non-aggressive countries wary of external powers dictating their scientific or militaristic developments would be vilified so the role of enemy never remain unfilled.
Was the Monroe Doctrine just a Joke?

In 1923, the Monroe Doctrine warned European colonizers that the United States would not tolerate further colonization of the Western Hemisphere. Just 60 years ago, when the Soviet Union began the building of missile-launching sites in Cuba, it was the Monroe Doctrine John Kennedy would symbolically invoke.

Since that time, the United States and its allies in NATO have spent countless billions of dollars nearly encircling Russia with military bases.

For no other reason than military superiority, which is hardly an ethical justification, what would be imaginable for an America – an enemy within striking range – became the global expectation.
Obama’s Messaging Failure

Consider the reaction in America if Vladimir Putin came into office advocating for a military alliance between Russia and the government in Mexico. The brash, globalist minded Obama burst into the White House doors with just that sentiment.

Obama said it was important to “send a clear signal throughout Europe that we are going to continue to abide by the central belief … that countries who seek and aspire to join NATO are able to join NATO.” Biden has continues with this exact same rhetoric.

To understand why such messaging is disastrous to Ukraine, you need to understand the under-reported demographic makeup of the state once affectionately known as “little Russia.” As revealed by the Orange Revolution, the country is badly divided between the west and the Russian speaking east.

The Ukrainian Civil War

In America’s haste to bring Ukraine into its military fold, as is so common in stories such as this, weapons and support were delivered to some particularly unsavory characters during the Ukrainian Civil War. For a country that so freely invokes Nazi imagery in its domestic, internal conflicts, our standards abroad are more forgiving.

Pictured along with John McCain, Oleh Tyahnybok is leader of Svoboda, a Ukrainian political party that received over 40 percent of the 2012 vote in many parts of western Ukraine. To briefly explain the Nazi roots of this political party, it’s important to note that some 800,000 Jews were murdered in Ukraine during the German occupation, many of them by a Ukrainian auxiliary known as the Galicia Division. When Western Ukrainian citizens organized a ceremony honoring the unit, it was Oleg Pankevich, a Svovoda parliamentarian, who did the honors of being front and center.

“I was horrified to see photographs…of young Ukrainians wearing the dreaded SS uniform with swastikas clearly visible on their helmets as they carried caskets of members of this Nazi unit, lowered them into the ground, and fired gun salutes in their honor,” World Jewish Congress president Ronald Lauder wrote in a letter at the time.

Picture how the United States would feel if Russia provided financial and militaristic aid to literal Nazi organizations in Canada.
Conclusion

In history, those surrounded by enemies promising continuation to conflict have not been seen as the aggressor. However, Russia taking offense to Western funding of horrible elements in bordering countries has created this irrational outrage, when no country on our planet would condone such a flagrant attempt at encroachment.

The American economy is in free-fall, and the vast majority of Americans are lacking any faith in its leadership. Regarding both Russia and America, choosing deescalation and seeking mutual collaboration could be the only way to appropriately respond to the true threat posed by China.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
plungesponge · 41-45, M
From what I can understand. America has no chance winning any kind of conflict in Ukraine against Russia. Seems to be more about trying to turn global sentiment against Russia while using the Ukrainian people as the sacrificial lamb
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@plungesponge They could, but it would require total commitment, a lengthy buildup, and result in a nuclear exchange - you can’t effectively fight Russians in Ukraine without counter-attacking into Russia.

And trying to would fracture NATO right off the bat.
plungesponge · 41-45, M
@QuixoticSoul yes exactly, militarily the US is unbeatable, but in reality is military effectiveness is much more dictated by domestic political concerns and corporate profiteering, so much so it can't even successfully accomplish objectives against third world nations like Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea. Unless those objectives were only presented to the public as in the national interest while actually about making the rich richer... winkwink chaching
@QuixoticSoul Actually, based on the current state of the US arsenal the US would probably get the worst of it in a nuclear exchange too. The last bombs added to the US arsenal were literally upgraded versions of a 1950s era bomb you have to load on a B-52 and fly over a target and drop like it is the Korean War again.

The US has not even designed an ICBM since the disco era and only has one company left with the capability to build them. A company that is known for only one thing and that is being late to deliver and massively over budget.

Russia has been working on their deterrent and missile tech steadily and have a far more robust manufacturing infrastructure that also has been designed to be resistant to material shortages and such.

The only people who think a war with Russia would go well for the US are a bunch of think tanks that think you can "win" MAD. Basically people who have no idea what they are talking about.


I got this from Jane's Aerospace btw, I am not making this shit up. I also have a buddy who is ex SAC who confirmed as much.


He also referred to the US B-1B as being the world's only self jamming bomber. lol

Bottom line it would be a bad idea all around.