Dr.Tony Fauci = Dr.Josef Mengele ?

"What you see on Dr Fauci, this is what people say to me, that he doesn’t represent science to them. He represents Josef Mengele, Dr Josef Mengele, the Nazi doctor who did experiments on Jews during the second world war and in the concentration camps, and I am talking about people all across the world are saying this.”

- Fox News host Lara Logan , yesterday.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Humanist321 · M

To all of you right wing anti-vaxxers who are saying such nonsense about Dr. Fauci, so far as I can see you are asserting he is worse than the greatest mass murderer of all time--so [b]please be specific[/b] about what crimes he has committed. Generalizations and unfounded assertions are meaningless.

For those of us who have a scientific medical background and who follow the news, it appears that he has recommended people get vaccines to help contain a deadly virus, that the majority of the medical profession agrees with him, and that as a result hundreds of thousands of lives were saved. This is a crime?

Disclosure: I am 85. I have both basic shots and the booster with no ill effects.

SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M

@Humanist321 It's hyperbole. Although he has never answered any serious questions about the NIH's funding of Wuhan's "gain of function" research.

Hyperbole like your 50 posts about Trump. 🙄

Humanist321 · M

@SumKindaMunster Hyperbole I guess. I haven't posted 50 times on here in the last 5 years.

WalterF · 70-79, M

@Humanist321 Read the book "The Real Antony Fauci." It's all there in black and white, fully documented, scholarly, watertight, and yet easy to read. A book that may bring him down.

RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M

@WalterF Written by Robert F Kennedy Jr. lol

SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M

@Humanist321 You're outrage would land better if you didn't have your own ridiculous and highly partisan beliefs about Donald Trump and Brett Kavanaugh. Maybe challenge yourself to read and absorb material that isn't your norm.

It's clear from your postings that you believe the now debunked conspiracy theory about Trump getting help from the Russians in his election bid, and you would seem to also believe the accusations about Brett Kavanaugh. It's tough to take someone seriously when they get outraged about partisan propaganda, when you yourself reek of it, albeit from the opposite side of the political spectrum.

Humanist321 · M

@SumKindaMunster Your comments are off topic here. So I made a posting about Trump getting help from the Russians and that has been sustained by evidence, and I believe that Brett Kavanaugh has moral and ethical deficiencies that make him an embarrassment on the Supreme Court. None of which has any bearing on the efficacy of vaccines, whether for the virus, the flu, or dozens of other diseases, and the need to stop the spread of Covid, which has already killed 700,000 Americans. The attack on Fauci, whether or not justified, is a diversion.

SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M

@Humanist321 My comments are in direct response to your pejorative comments about "right wing antivaxxers" and Laura Logan.

I am pointing out that you are outraged by the besmirching of the reputation of Dr Fauci and focusing on what you seem to believe is his benevolent overseeing of the Covid 19 pandemic. He is a public figure with a long history in the public eye and there is plenty in his past that is worthy of scorn and questioning including his ongoing poor handling of the Covid 19 pandemic, and overseeing of horrible and unnecessary experiments that literally involve the torture of beagles.

My point was to demonstrate to you that you have no problem posting exaggerated, irrelevant or just plain wrong misinformation about the 2 men I referenced, but when someone else does it to someone you agree with or admire, you are outraged.

You're a hypocrite who is blind to his own double standards.

LeopoldBloom · M

@WalterF It’s weird how you people are so focused on a minor government bureaucrat. If Fauci is so terrible, why didn’t Twitler can him? He certainly canned plenty of other people.

WalterF · 70-79, M

@LeopoldBloom Oh, wait a month or two. The book about him is best-seller on Amazon, apparently. He will certainly have read it. Yet not a cheep from him. No lawsuits, no public condemnation by him of lies and slander. Why not? One wonders... The problem for him is that every statement (no suppositions or theories, just FACTS) is backed up by EVIDENCE. A fatal blow has been dealt to him; the secrets are out.

Time will tell.

LamontCranston · M

@LeopoldBloom He is not a minor government bureaucrat.

This message was deleted by its author.

SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M

@WalterF No idea what you are babbling about, you sure you responded to the correct person?

WalterF · 70-79, M

@SumKindaMunster Very true. Beg your pardon. Have sorted it.

WalterF · 70-79, M

@RodionRomanovitch This is a strange reaction. Obviously you despise Kennedy, for the 26 reasons that the fact-checkers feed you. This hypnotises you into thinking that, because of these reasons, the man cannot write - or, if he can, his writings ard worthless. But in fact, it's your reasoning that is worthless. This is a very competent volume, scientifically supported, FULLY evidence-based (isn't "evidence-based" one of the factors you insist on?). So you are shooting yourself in the foot by saying "Him! LOL!". This must be the most pathetic argument to date! Make an "evidence-based" evaluation yourself, by reading the book - or else hold your peace.

SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M

@WalterF All good brother, carry on.