Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

So what did we learn from the Rittenhouse trial?

Because it feels like the lesson is 'shoot back'. Is the law really going to rule "Last one alive is innocent"?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
That there's a clear bias from supporters of Rittenhouse. Everyone Rittenhouse decided to shoot will be said to have been violent in some way shape or form, even if it's clearly the opposite
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Babylon And another pmsnbc viewer shows their ignorance
@sunsporter1649 isn't this comical
Carissimi · F
But it isn’t the opposite. The evidence is those shot were criminals. That’s a fact. However, just because someone is a criminal doesn’t mean they deserve to die, but unfortunately, for them, Kyle Rittenhouse was within his rights to defend his own life from those attacking him. The case should be decided on evidence and law, not politics, ideology and bias. Justice was served today. The problem for you, and radical Leftists is you judge based on emotion, misinformation, and reckless disregard for due process, evidence, and the law. @Babylon
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@Carissimi there was an armed man who watched Kyle shoot two people dead. This armed man had his gun pointing at Kyle and instead of ending Kyle's life (because he justifiably knows Kyle might senselessly shoot him, too) he approaches Kyle in point blank range and still doesn't kill Kyle. He talks to Kyle and tries to disarm him to prevent another shooting and Kyle just shoots him in the arm right there 😂

All that effort, ability to kill Kyle, and he tries talking the man out of his weapon and just gets shot. Is he a criminal for trying to stop Kyle?

[quote] The problem for you, and radical Leftists is you judge based on emotion, misinformation, and reckless disregard for due process, evidence, and the law [/quote]
Be careful about making things up about others and just labeling others. I will not do that to you or make things up about you, so please be respectful 😪
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Babylon A left-wing nut job chases you two blocks with a drawn pistol and you want to have a friendly little chat?
@sunsporter1649 I'd pick him and his responsible firearm etiquette over Rittenhouse. Let me ask you, should that dude have tried to talk Rittenhouse out of shooting more people? Tell me what the right-wing thing to do is for that guy trying to talk to Rittenhouse
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Babylon Responsible firearm etiquette is pointing a pistol at someone's head? The clown is damn lucky his breathing permit was not cancelled like the other two clown's
@sunsporter1649 since you clearly are older and wiser than I am, enlighten me with your view on these:

- how should the armed man have approached Kyle after seeing him shoot the two people (one having attacked him, the other trying to disarm him)
- would you have a problem if he killed Kyle in fear of his life

Or do you think Kyle was behaving properly that night?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Babylon Why did the clown chase a guy two blocks knowing the guy had a rifle over his shoulder? Damn stupid, imho
@sunsporter1649 it is clear why you're not going to answer my questions after dodging them twice

I suggest reconsidering this tribalist loyalty
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Babylon Why did the dude travel 52 miles to participate in a riot, carrying a pistol?
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Babylon He shouldn't have approached him at all! He's not a law officer he has no right or duty to approach Rittenhouse in that manner.

If Rittenhouse was the aggressor and he chased this guy instead of the other way around, and the guy thought his life was in danger, he might have been justified in using deadly force.

But that's not how it went down.
@SumKindaMunster you know what, I can agree with you on that but I want to see if you're biased 🤔

If it's wrong to act like an officer, is Rittenhouse also wrong for policing streets that are 2 hours away from his house, armed, and breaking curfew like he is an officer? Or does he get an unjust privilege?
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Babylon You're whole premise is biased, I suggest you do more research on what happened and answer your biased questions on your own.

Of course I'm "biased", I'm a human being, what you're really asking is if my biases line up with yours... based on that question, they dont.
@SumKindaMunster that's a pretty odd deflection to answering the question but that's okay

I don't know why Rittenhouse's supporters struggle to criticize his poor decisions 🤷🏾‍♂️
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Babylon Likely because its irrelevant to the actions he was charged with, yet the indoctrinated cannot stop obsessing over bullshit minutiae straight from the bullshit MSM and demanding a purity test imposed upon Rittenhouse decisions, and actions that you aren't applying to the people he killed, nor the media and culture for pushing a bullshit narrative about white supremacy that could have gotten Rittenhouse imprisoned or killed.