Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do self-defence laws (US) allow vigilantes to kill with impunity ?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
babieseatcrap · 41-45, M
screw those people better off without em if you had a child would you want that child molesting butt fusker rosenbaum around your little boy?
SW-User
@babieseatcrap "Murder is cool as long as I don't like the person being killed"
@SW-UserY’know, there’s a thing that conservatives always seem to do when someone they value kills someone they don’t: they judge the person killed (after the fact) as "worthy of life". So even if he (or she) wasn’t committing a capital crime when being killed, they search for any criminal records, or if they don’t exist, as in the case of Trayvon Martin, they make something up. Due process has no meaning to them, if the person killed is the "wrong" color, or in this case, supporting the "wrong" cause.
SW-User
@bijouxbroussard It's fucking disgusting. The same people have the gall the call themselves pro-life.
@SW-User Funny how that works, isn’t it ? Also the same folks most likely to support the death penalty. They’re [b]not[/b] pro-life, they just want to get to choose who dies. 😞
babieseatcrap · 41-45, M
@bijouxbroussard they call that deflection would you want that dirty man around your child or would you rather him not
@babieseatcrap Do you think Rittenhouse knew anything about the men he shot ? Other than the fact that they were attending a BLM rally ? Are you saying that man was molesting a child when he was shot ? Because if he [b]wasn’t[/b], his past was irrelevant in this situation.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@babieseatcrap Nobody raped Rittenhouse. Nobody invited him out to that rally, either. He took an automatic weapon and decided, on his own, to go.
Whatever he thought he was doing, he wasn’t law enforcement and had no business being there. Whatever you think, lives were lost solely because of choices Rittenhouse made.
babieseatcrap · 41-45, M
@bijouxbroussard nope choices people wanting to loot and burn made why they are dead few less now though
@babieseatcrap Do you know for a fact that those particular men were "looting & burning" when Rittenhouse killed them ? If so, weren’t they entitled to a trial ? Rittenhouse didn’t have the authority to kill anyone for any reason, and [b]I repeat[/b]: it was HIS choice to go, uninvited, to a BLM rally.
SW-User
@babieseatcrap How are you not totally fucking embarrassed right now?
babieseatcrap · 41-45, M
@bijouxbroussard town doesn't belong to them wasnt rally was a riot like they hoping for strange that they tried that crap in my town and were surrounded and outnumbered and nobody got hurt and nothing was burned
babieseatcrap · 41-45, M
@SW-User cuz don't care what you think I just messing with you crazy communist
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@babieseatcrap No, it was in fact a protest rally. The town surely didn’t belong to Rittenhouse—he drove there from someplace else. He was from Antioch, Illinois.
@babieseatcrap And now you’re calling names ?