This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
You are correct, as far as you go. The additional reason for that distinction was to put all states, no matter of size, on the same footing in the U.S. Senate since states with the largest populations were going to have the advantage in the House. That effort to provide some balance, to provide a brake on the danger of mobocracy, where everyone goes following what's "trending" like lemmings, is very constructive. The filibuster rule in the Senate -- which is not part of the Constitution -- allowing the minority to essentially block EVEN DISCUSSION of anything they don't like -- not so much.