Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Does anyome changed their mind about the Afghan War?

I asked because it was widely supported at the time of the invasion.

Have you changed your mind on this? If so, why? Do you think it could ever have worked out and what do you think would have been a good outcome? Do you feel you were lied to?

Please keep the Trump vrs Biden stuff off the thread because it's not relevent to my question. Thanks.
Top | New | Old
OldBrit · 61-69, M Best Comment
I wasn't in favour of invasion originally because I feared it would end up like this at some point. We stride in telling a country how it should be run etc. We lead to the deaths of thousands of the countrymen, women and children and then give a lot of freedom to some only now for what?

So all we wanted was the terrorist training bases gone? How's that taken 20 years and so many deaths? And now what will be the cost once 1st Sept comes around?

So no I didn't think it would ever work as we never really listen to the people of the country we just try to sell them UK/USA version of "freedom".

Overall - it is just so so sad
HoraceGreenley · 61-69, M
@OldBrit look at my comments. The answer is there.

Doing nothing is not an option
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@HoraceGreenley Tightening security was an option and so was the SEAL team assassination of Bin Laden.

Both were acceptable options. Invading a country should not have been an option.
HoraceGreenley · 61-69, M
@Burnley123 Providing a safe haven allowing hostile terrorist organizations to operate openly and notoriously, before and after massive attacks provides the option.

QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
I was never for that war, especially considering the Taliban offered to give us Osama if we showed them some evidence that he was behind the attacks.

9/11 made Americans fucking crazy, it was incredible to observe up close. It was a wild time, felt like people needed to have a war somewhere, and it didn't even matter why, or what for. People got used to being super safe, I guess, so the event was a total shock.

Anyway, at the time I was still deciding whether to become an American citizen or not - maybe that made me somewhat detached, because the attacks did not have a particularly strong personal effect on me. It seemed like everyone else totally lost their minds.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@beckyromero If the Taliban military attacked us, things would be simple, sure - but even at the time we knew that the Taliban had no actual hand in the attack, and didn't even know about it. Any other government in their place would likewise request evidence before handing someone over, or allowing law enforcement operations on its territory. It's just basic jurisdictional face-saving. We would also do the same if someone orchestrated a terrorist attack elsewhere from US soil.

@LvChris Americans aren't cowards. They're just soft as a people - which is distinct from their military. That's ok, the wages of a civilized life.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Yes.

In 2001 I thought Bush did the right thing invading Afghanistan and going directly after Bin Laden. And I thought the CIA was doing a great job trading suitcases of money for tribal loyalty to go after the fanatics.

I was shocked, at the end of 2001, when Bin Laden escaped thru Tora Bora. I was even more shocked when Bush changed directions, pulled troops out of Afghanistan, and focused on Iraq.

Afghanistan on the back burner in 2003, leaving the job undone, was the huge mistake in my view. Any decisions about Afghanistan should have been made in those first 5 years. Kicking the can down the road only continued the mistake.

Update Since Bush didn't pull us out, Obama should have grasped the nettle. Since Obama didn't grasp the nettle, Trump should have. Finally Biden did. I do wonder what the Joint Chiefs told Obama & Trump about our situation there.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@ElwoodBlues
I was shocked, at the end of 2001, when Bin Laden escaped thru Tora Bora.

Because Rummy fought the war on the cheap.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Burnley123
I think it was badly executed. There needed to be some serious money and organisation put into reconstruction. Some of this was done but too little and too late. Same with Iraq.

I agree with you there.
@beckyromero
Because Rummy fought the war on the cheap.
Right. And Rummy's genius was bureaucratic battles, not actual ones. He told Bush the Pentagon couldn't get involved unless he, Rummy had total control. Bureaucratic checkmate, leading directly to tactical failure.
Northwest · M
All along, this has been my opinion:

1. We should not have invaded Afghanistan. There were better ways to deal with with the threat against the USA.

2. But we did invade, so trying to fix what we broke became a moral imperative.

3. But try as we may, we cannot fix what was broken, and had nothing to do with our invasion, and by that I mean society, so we should stop our attempt to build a nation in our image.

4. But we did exactly that, and that earned us another decade in Afghanistan as we tried to salvage our investment.

5. And 20 years later, it's time to leave. It's going to be messy and there is no possible way to prevent the chaos, no matter how much planning is done. It's like major surgery, there will be loss of blood, and post-op consequences, no matter how skilled the surgical team might be.

I have not changed my mind about any of this.
windinhishair · 70-79, M
The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were doomed to failure. The war in Afghanistan at least had a defensible basis at the beginning because that is where bin Laden was, and as you note, many people supported it. But he quickly moved to Pakistan so the original reasoning was no longer valid. Just as the Soviet war against Afghanistan was doomed to failure, so was ours. The Bush Administration lied about both wars, and the US people were misled. It cost us a trillion dollars and many lives.
I never thought invading Afganistan was a good idea.

But it didn't seem like as bad an idea as Iraq.

Funny thing is, I don't feel like I was lied to as badly with Afghanistan as I was with Iraq.

WMD and oil aside, I guess I just didn't buy anyone saying that Afganistan was not going to be a quagmire.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@MistyCee People forget how one sided the media debate was at the time.
@Burnley123 Post 9-11 was a crazy time. Even the folks who knew we were likely stepping in the same filth the Russians, and before them, the Brittish had gotten caught up in before couldn't really argue about going after Bin Laden, and in retrospect, I guess finding scapegoats other than the Saudis was a huge clue as to where the Republican party was going to go later.

Having said that, I do remember plenty of people saying if we go there, we will be responsible for fixing it, as well as people saying, this particular hellhole is not going to be easily fixed.
Budwick · 70-79, M
I'm glad we're getting out.

I only wish someone would have given more thought to getting civilians out before the military.
Budwick · 70-79, M
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Budwick Erm. A lot.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Burnley123
I just wish people who supported Bush could admit they were wrong.

I don't think he was wrong for going in. So I don't think I'm wrong for supporting it.

It was poorly executed.
JesseInTX · 51-55, M
I thoroughly supported the war and it was the right thing to do. What I don’t understand is why pulling out is needed. The fact is the war had been won long ago. We’ve kept 80,000 troops in Japan and 60,000 in after WWII and 30,000 in S. Korea since the Korean War. Why the need to get 4,000 out of Afghanistan who’s presence kept the taliban at bay and the nation secure?
@JesseInTX Lol. No. But those are not even remotely the same thing. The fact you compare them shows you don't know shit.


Lol. And they Taliban took less than 2 weeks to blow it up in your face. That is failure, not victory. And anyone who thought that would even happen is an idiot or gullible.
@JesseInTX And if those are your personal metrics for victory explain the last 10 years. Should be fun to hear the response.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JoeyFoxx · 56-60, M
In the aftermath of 9/11, it was difficult to not support the initial invasion. Hindsight is dangerous. Based on the temporary unity that was evident nationwide in the US in 2001, I don’t believe most people who claim they didn’t support this initially.

With that, the doubling down along with nation building is nothing I ever supported. Pouring billions into trillions of dollars was never going to pay off.

We should have been much more strategic in this and done a better job at sharing the responsibility for cleaning up years of meddling in the Middle East with NATO partners.

If we really wanted to build up Afghanistan, then we should have established trade routes with value on both sides. But the US hasn’t done that in a century, paving the way for China.

I support pulling out. I’m not thrilled with how it’s been done.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@SW-User The fact that the literal children of the original invasion force is withdrawing now is evidence that something went sideways a long time ago.
Ironicman · 56-60, M
I say
War-huh!
What is good for
Absolutely nothing
MarineBob · 61-69, M
@Ironicman it bought Cheney some bullets
As a Canadian I am glad I could stop checking to see if people I went to school with are coming home in boxes back in 2014.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
No.

I still think it was the right thing to do. We were attacked by a terrorist group harbored and supported in that nation.

As I've said, I do not thing we did enough to pave the road to a more democratic Afghanistan by pushing women's rights. Nor do I feel we did enough to rout the Taliban in the first place.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Burnley123 As
someone else said to you in another post, 9/11 is less likely because security and intelligence have improved.


🤣

That person also essentially wants a surveillance state and armed air marshals on every airline flight (without explaining how to pay for it, by the way).

And if you really think airline safety has improved, you're kidding yourself. Most of the stuff going on is window-dressing.

Terrorists are fighting over there instead of plotting their way to come up with attacks here.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@beckyromero No that person doesn't. The Taliban didn't even take part in 9/11,remember. Neither did Saddam.

There have been numerous terrorist attacks in Europe since then, indicating that the wars have made the world less safe.

The loss of life in Iraq and Afghanistan is orders of multitude higher than any of that though.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Burnley123
The Taliban didn't even take part in 9/11,remember. Neither did Saddam.

Saddam? No. The Taliban harbored the planners and refused demands to turn them over.

You really think Europe wouldn't be a terrorist target if 9/11 hadn't happened?

It was before.
HoraceGreenley · 61-69, M
No. the botched withdrawal doesn't change the benefits of going to Afghanistan in the first place.
HoraceGreenley · 61-69, M
@Burnley123 You think the people that died are innocent?

As for protecting me, history shows that over the last 20 years the strategy worked. Who are you, Rip Van Winkle?

We already know it's worked.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@HoraceGreenley If it worked we wouldn't be pulling out and the Taliban would not have retaken the country. Of the deaths on Afghanistan, 71,000 were civilians. Or 23 9/11s.

Hpw many Afghan lives is one American life worth?
HoraceGreenley · 61-69, M
@Burnley123
You are conflating policy and execution. We're leaving because of the expense. Not in maintaining our troops but in nation building.

The strategy workd. Mission creep became a problem.

The message is, don't attack another country.
Adaydreambeliever · 61-69, F
I was never in favour and never supported it.. it was a bad move and the mess that has been left behind now just proves it.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
I was against it then and remain so today. Bush and the Deep State wanted a war and they got two. Both have been disasters.
BlueVeins · 26-30
Eh, I go back and forth about whethter or not invading in the first place was a good idea, but I've always thought it was stupid to remain after more than a few years. The basic idea of just dropping in and kicking a government's ass when they attack us (through proxies or otherwise) is decent in itself because it discourages countries from attacking us. Probably killed a lot of Al-Qaeda operatives, which is nice. But obviously, there are costs to war, and these days I tend to think we're better off just improving security moving forwards and putting most of our focus into more boring but more important killers like heart disease.
I remember the atmosphere after 9/11 and everyone was looking for a target of revenge. Iraq didn’t make any sense, because those WMDs never appeared but we knew Afghanistan’s Taliban and Pakistan were sympathetic to Osama bin Laden and willing to hide him from us. So going into Afghanistan to get him made some sense. But we should’ve been out of there, especially after Bin Laden was killed. And we have no excuse for the lost lives in Iraq.
Personally I am glad that our involvement after so long is hopefully in its last days and we’re out.
Technically it was not a war as it was not a declared war. It was approved as a military action and sadly dragged on far too long.
Too many other factors played into our going into Afghanistan and it took a heavy toll. IMO.
Hopefully come 31 Aug we finally walk away for good.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@soar2newhighs Can I ask, did you support the invasion at the time?
@Burnley123 No because I remember how a powerful nation like Russia invaded and was forced to leave. And after Viet Nam, I didn’t see the American people wanting another quagmire.
Khenpal1 · M
Well, USA will be back there within 10 years time 😂
@Burnley123 The Taliban are not great but they are far from the worst option in the country. A friend of mine fled the previous "government". The Taliban got support from the people because they are liberal democrats compared to the previous Northern Alliance for example.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Nope. What matters is convenience. Ideology is just the stuff you use to fool the proles.
Khenpal1 · M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Now way , you can't have opium as currency , its not like Colombia 30 years ago. Its a place without any infrastructure for mining. Only if Taliban's become Chinese subjects , which I doubt.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jsvmQR19TE
SumKindaMunster · 56-60, M
It seem so long ago, but the original reason why we invaded Afghanistan is because they were hosting and supporting Osama Bin Laden and his Al Queda network. It was from Afghanistan he planned, coordinated and executed the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

It seems he escaped into Pakistan not long after so we probably should have wrapped up our involvement there in 2004 at the latest.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
What’s the point of a ginormous military if you aren’t going to use it after 9.11?

If we aren’t going to have any more Vietnams, Iraqs, or Afghanistans, let’s spend that money in a more productive way.

I’m sick of this losing stuff.
@Fukfacewillie Aww that's sweet. I'm not that nice, really, but I try to be respectful of others.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Fukfacewillie The plan is to make T***" go away by talking about him all the time.

Bollocks.

She is nice though.
@Burnley123 Thanks, but I'm not that rational, nor am I paid to try and make Trump go away.

I've even pled guilty to being afflicted by TDS, i.e., an obsession with the amoral and anti-human behavior that Trump has inflicted on millions of Americans.

But, that said, this is not on topic to your post.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
I thought we went there for the right reasons
But we stayed way too long and had no real strategy
I feel like I was sold a false bill of goods on this one
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Wasn't for supporting the Afghan government after 9-11

Wasn't for supporting Bin Laden in 1978.

Going after him in Pakistan was totally necessary though.
MarineBob · 61-69, M
Biden was for it.now he isn't
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@MarineBob Its a borderline breach of what my post said but it is true and kind of relevent.

Biden is hardly alone. Most Americans and Brits supported the war at the time of the invasion. This was especially (though not exclusively) true on the political right.

Where are these people?
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@MarineBob In 2001 you couldn't be against invading Afghanistan and be in politics, people were still in the post-9/11 mania and nobody was seeing straight. If he sobered up eventually, that was only a good thing.
Keepitsimple · 56-60, F
At one point in time Afghanistan was a nice place to live and foreigners vacationed there. It’s the terror cells that keep popping up because they want women home and covered up. They can’t live like decent and kind human beings. They do not play nice and can’t be rationed with. I do think we need to be there in some capacity. If nothing else for women and children’s safety.
TexChik · F
Had we known that a spineless boob would endanger thousands of Americans, rearm a terrorist faction with millions of dollars worth of our weapons, tech, and equipment plus allow China into the middle east...we should have stayed with a much more ramped up objective of destroying the enemy when we had a president that wasnt such a boob.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@TexChik When the Taliban storm a capital, at leat they do it effectively. RINO.
TexChik · F
@Burnley123 Antifa was responsible for that
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@TexChik Antifa are the real fascists. They stormed the capital to overturn the election for Trump. Its why Biden funds them.
ExtremeNext · 36-40
I miss my Donny 😩
Quetzalcoatlus · 46-50, M
Bush should’ve pulled tf out when he declared mission accomplished..
SW-User
My opinion is unchanged; I always thought it was a stupid idea.

Although by the time I was old enough to actually have a good grasp on what happened and what was going on I guess that was already readily apparent to anyone who isn't a Jingo.
Not at all. I supported it at the start, and stopped when the objective changed and we forgot why we were there. I support ending the war, but this is the stupidest and most deadly way possible
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@PrivateHell This is what leaving when you lost is like, man - it's always going to be chaotic and dangerous.
@QuixoticSoul bullshit. Cheap justifications and excuses won't cover up the fact this was a total cluster fuck. Yes, there was going to be losses. That was no reason to magnify them.

Remove the civilians and support, then the equipment and weapons, then pull the troops. Even a trained monkey could have grasped this. But apparently that was too much to expect from Biden.
Nope. Was in the streets protesting at 19 and I still think it was a stupid idea.
SmartKat · 61-69, F
I never did think it was a good idea.

I think we should have helped the endangered people get out….and let the dangerous people go ahead and kill each other.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
I didn’t change my mind, but recognize leaving was going to happen at some point. A former CIA intelligence analyst was opining that the Soviets basically destroyed the country and it was wildly naive of the US to think they could really bring it back.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Fukfacewillie Afghanistan was better under the commies, and Afghans would be way better off now if the West never funded the Muj.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@QuixoticSoul A very different take! The name of the analyst I heard was Paul Miller from a Podcast by Dan Snow. He seems like a real Neo-Con.


https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/dan-snows-history-hit/id1042631089?i=1000532446272
Keepitsimple · 56-60, F
We need something long term there. We couldn’t just be attacked and not to do anything. I think both the USA and Afghanistan don’t have their crap together.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Keepitsimple We could have killed Bin Laden and left - the Taliban could not (and likely wouldn't have tried to) prevent us from hunting down Al Qaeda. In the end, we had to kill him in Pakistan anyway.

The nation building was purely optional and totally self inflicted.
swirlie · 31-35

"It was widely supported at the time" ..of the original invasion, but what was actually being supported was the perception of truth that was being manufactured by the US government at the time, which was a storyline the American government wanted the world to engage with and which the G7 couldn't resist getting onboard with because of it's American source, which everyone knows is "intelligent", correct?

A story the Late Fred Trump use to tell Donald when Don was but a mere youth sporting short pants with suspenders and black and white saddle shoes, was that, "if you tell something to someone often enough and stick with the same storyline at all times, your story will eventually become 'fact' in the minds of those whom you told and those whom you told will then defend your story with their own life if anyone ever challenges that story they had always embraced".

It was a 'story' the US government told to the American people 20 years ago that became 'fact' in the minds of those American people.

And over the next 20 years, Americans along with so-called 'aliens' from the remaining G7 Nations whom looked just like authentic Americans standing shoulder-to-shoulder at a bar during 'happy hour', defended that American story alongside those Americans and usually did so with their own lives too.
swirlie · 31-35
@MistyCee

Fred and Fred's own mother were the Masterminds behind the creation of 'Trump Corp', which evolved back in the 1930's. Don was merely handed the keys to the front door after Fred died of dementia.
@swirlie Well, it makes sense from what I've heard about Fred's politics anyway, and the timing is right for him to have imparted that piece of wisdom to Donald.
swirlie · 31-35
@MistyCee

Fred was actually a financial genius, unlike Don but whom Fred employed.

Don on the other hand was (and is) a Master con-man, unlike Fred, but which became Don's job description the whole time he remained employed by Fred.

 
Post Comment