Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How can you consider the act of restricting voters from voting to be constitutional?

In a Democratic society, how is it constitutional to limit the people’s right to vote?
Keeper · M
By requiring them to provide an easily obtained ID in order to ensure they are actual residents of the State?
@Keeper but you better have your vaccination card
hlpflwthat · M
@Keeper Read this.

https://www.quora.com/How-difficult-is-it-to-obtain-a-voter-ID-Why-is-it-claimed-that-voter-ID-laws-would-disenfranchise-minorities
I need an ID to pick up a six pack, & dems want me to accept votes from unknowns without legal recognition, c'mon man rlly?
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Unfortunately it's not a true democracy. It's a democratic republic.

Where "democratic" modifies republic.

To the deniers. Look at the US Constitution before you argue!

Just stating a well known fact!

[quote]Article IV Section 4

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a [b][u]Republican[/u][/b] Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
[/quote]
ᵀʰᵉ ᵒⁿˡʸ ᵖˡᵃᶜᵉ ʷʰᵉʳᵉ ʳᵉᵖᵘᵇˡⁱᶜᵃⁿ ⁱˢ ᵐᵉⁿᵗⁱᵒⁿᵉᵈ. ᴰᵉᵐᵒᶜʳᵃᵗⁱᶜ ⁿᵒʳ ᵈᵉᵐᵒᶜʳᵃᶜʸ ⁱˢ ᵐᵉⁿᵗⁱᵒⁿᵉᵈ ᵃᵗ ᵃˡˡ.
helenS · 36-40, F
It's a convenient way for a minority to make sure they will stay in power.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@helenS convenient maybe but very unconstitutional.
helenS · 36-40, F
@justanothername To a certain degree, those in power decide what is and isn't constitutional. 😐
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Both sides play this game.
Same anytime ‘boundary changes’ are deemed ‘necessary’.

A major flaw in having just a two party system
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Picklebobble2 The two-party system is deeply flawed, but the US Constitution has always been inclusionary, protective of rights and expansive in its capacity.

The GOP seeks to exclude, restrict and limit freedoms. That's the difference between the two.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@Graylight But the fact the Republicans so often propose this kind of thing is evidence that on occasion sheer weight of numbers in Congress or the Senate might actually see this kind of thing become law
@Picklebobble2 except election rules are decided at the state level, aside from electors there's no federal election law in the US. Each state has their own laws governing that.

The number of either party in the Senate or congress doesn't matter.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@helenS Well that’s a bit tricky then isn’t it because it s the Republicans who are trying to push the vote through but it’s the Biden and the Democrats who are in power.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@justanothername And what the GOP fails to understand is that while they're setting up a next election win by any means necessary, they're also legislating things that, in the other party's hands, will be used be used against them.
smiler2012 · 56-60
{@justanothername ] well you cannot do that 🤷‍♂️
Graylight · 51-55, F
@smiler2012 Well, in about half the states now, you apparently can.

 
Post Comment