Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

One Overlooked Possible Explanation As to Who Owns the U.F.O.s

On July 8, 1947, the Roswell Army Air Field issued a press release announcing the recovery of a "flying disc" from a ranch near Roswell, New Mexico.

A retraction soon followed but every since there has been wild speculation that a spacecraft of extra-terrestrial origin was recovered.

So, what about the recent frenzy of U.F.O. activity harassing U.S. naval vessels?

So far there have been basically three theories as to whom the U.F.O.'s belong to:

(1) China
(2) Russia
(3) an extra-terrestrial civilization

The problem with it being China is that one would have to believe the Chinese were able to somehow get these craft across the Pacific without being noticed and, if by submarine that would be highly unlikely as the U.S. Navy is pretty darn good at tracking subs.

If it is the Chinese, it wouldn't be the first time we would have had a catastrophic intelligence failure. But still. For the Chinese to have leap-frogged that far ahead of the U.S. technologically seems unrealistic.

The Russians? Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid thinks so. And we know Vladimir Putin has been investing heavily in high-tech military equipment. Russian subs are more quiet that Chinese subs. And perhaps the message is being sent: "Ukraine is ours when we want it."

E.T.? Well, given that one former military officer has said the technology exhibited by the U.F.O.s is 100 to 1,000 years ahead of us, that's a strong possibility.

[quote]'It's possible someone found us before we found them': Two retired Navy officers warn that infamous UFO Tic-Tac sighting indicates 'technology that outstrips our arsenal by at least 100 to 1,000 years'[/quote]
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9590727/Ex-Navy-officer-says-UFO-technology-100-1-000-years-ahead-United-States.html

But there's a fourth explanation.

[b]THEY'RE OURS.[/b]

And we got that high-tech from decades of studying a crashed U.F.O. in the New Mexico desert in 1947.

Just a thought...
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
1. How come UFO's only are detectable in the dark of night with grainy photos that could be almost anything?

2. If they are secret Russian or Chinese assets, why would they first test them only in the USA where they most likely would be detected?

3. If they are from another world, why are they only exploring Earth? Why aren't they investigating what is going on on Mars?

4. If they are American, why would the government allow the government to see and talk about it only raising the curiosity of people they seem not to want anyone to know about?

5. If the flying objects are so advanced, why are they so easily detectable by primitive 21st century tracking technology?
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@MarkPaul

1. So as to be less easily identified? Or maybe some camera-jamming tech.

2. To let us know what they have?

3. Maybe they [i]are[/i] exploring our whole solar system. Or maybe they passed up Mars because there's no oil there.

4. Because maybe it's [i]us[/i] who want the other major powers on Earth to know what we have, i.e. don't mess with us.

5. Because if they are extra-terrestrial, they are so far advanced that they don't care we can tract them.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@beckyromero I "feel" 1 and 5 are in conflict.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@MarkPaul

Not if (1) is the Russians or Chinese and (5) is E.T.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
Jessichaos · 26-30, F
@MarkPaul If you watch the latest 60 min on it, the main reason we are able to track them now are advances in IR tracking and radar. Most of those grainy films released by the air force are done through IR which is why they look that way.

I am only really referring to the 4 videos declassified and released by the USAF between 2004-2015.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@Jessichaos I suppose that makes sense, but my point is when it comes to UFO's, BigFoot, DogMen, etc., it's always grainy photos offered as evidence.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@MarkPaul

Surely you don't think Nessie is...

Jessichaos · 26-30, F
@MarkPaul I hear you, which is why I limited any examination of "evidence" to the "official" sources. The government isn't saying "its Def space men", which is why they call them UAPs to remove the stigma of UFO. It will be interesting as Marco Rubio is leading the Senate charge to get answers via Intel committee.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@MarkPaul

Speaking of "grainy footage" . . . 😉

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxpecER2hmU]
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@beckyromero That isn't that grainy.