Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Veganism has the unassailable moral high ground. Change my mind.

Among populations where eating meat and animal products in not made necessary by economic conditions, vegans are morally correct that animal suffering trumps your enjoyment of animal products.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Elessar · 26-30, M
As @JohnRing said, it's a type of diet that involves either relying on a high amount of industrial/processed crap, or a (risky) DIY approach that will most likely result in an unbalanced and unhealthy diet, especially if without medical supervision and/or constant diagnostic monitoring. Its proponents focus only on the good aspects forgetting completely the reasons that make it extremely unpractical and unlikely to become anything more than a niche market, exclusively for wealthy/mid-class people living in wealthy countries.

If the goal is reducing/eliminating farming, we have a much better luck with synthetic meat provided that 1) it'll become much cheaper than now and 2) it can be grown into full muscles/organs than just a messy aggregation of cells that are at most suitable for making burgers.
@Elessar

Yeah synthetic meat is something i'm very excited about.
But is "it's harder to eat vegan" really a defeater of the moral argument in favour of veganism?
Elessar · 26-30, M
@Pikachu Well, forcing people to change their diet habits especially in a way that can possibly create problems (from physical, to social and even psychological), would raise ethical questions too.

Not forcing anyone (i.e. the situation we have now), results in extremely low adoption rates to have any observable impacts altogether on farming.

I don't think it works. Similarly to how prohibition didn't work for alcohol.
@Elessar

The practical enforcement or adoption of veganism seems to me to be a separate issue to the moral superiority of the position.

If one has the means to stop feeding off the suffering of animals then i can't see a moral argument not to.