This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
usher · 41-45, F
I'm not exactly a fan of Trump, but some of his policies were good for America and the world. For instance his NOT joining the Paris accord on climate change was a good call. The fraud on climate has gone way out of hand. But there is more stuff on NOT giving IRAN nuclear ability. I do honestly think he was more good than bad.
1-25 of 67
@usher IMO a Trump supporter I believe he did things that were in the best interests of the United States.
usher · 41-45, F
@soar2newhighs I truly agree
Northwest · M
@usher
I think you're a little confused, more like everything you said is wrong.
We WERE Part of the Paris Accord. He issued an executive order, pulling us out.
Right, so we had an agreement with Iran, that prevented them from developing nukes. He pulled us out of that agreement, allowing Iran to continue enrichment Uranium.
What else are you confused about?
I think you're a little confused, more like everything you said is wrong.
For instance his NOT joining the Paris accord on climate change was a good call.
We WERE Part of the Paris Accord. He issued an executive order, pulling us out.
But there is more stuff on NOT giving IRAN nuclear ability.
Right, so we had an agreement with Iran, that prevented them from developing nukes. He pulled us out of that agreement, allowing Iran to continue enrichment Uranium.
What else are you confused about?
quitwhendone · M
@usher If you think climate change is a fraud you simply haven't seen the data. The information is in the public domain. Read up in it.
usher · 41-45, F
@quitwhendone Don't be an idiot. There is overwhelming evidence that this is a fraud.
Northwest · M
@usher
Do you mind sharing some of that evidence?
CO2 is the single largest contributor to heat-trapping factors. 40% of CO2 will remain in the atmosphere for 100 years, and 20% for 1,000 years, and 10% for 10,000 years. This is the science. The more CO2 we make, the greater the cumulative effect, causing temperatures on the earth's surface to rise continuously.
This is the science.
I'm sure there could be a cataclysmic event, but I'm sure there will be another earthquake in Seattle as well. Do we stop creating/enforcing earthquake preparedness standards?
You really have no clue how this went down, do you?
Climate change blaming co2 as the cause id wrong and there is lots of evidence of this.
Do you mind sharing some of that evidence?
CO2 is the single largest contributor to heat-trapping factors. 40% of CO2 will remain in the atmosphere for 100 years, and 20% for 1,000 years, and 10% for 10,000 years. This is the science. The more CO2 we make, the greater the cumulative effect, causing temperatures on the earth's surface to rise continuously.
This is the science.
I'm sure there could be a cataclysmic event, but I'm sure there will be another earthquake in Seattle as well. Do we stop creating/enforcing earthquake preparedness standards?
Not giving Iran a deal on nuclear power is definitley good as now they can't get their hands on Uranium.
You really have no clue how this went down, do you?
quitwhendone · M
@usher Like what? Present your "evidence."
usher · 41-45, F
@quitwhendone sure, Co2 lags Earth temperature. That's a scientific fact. So co2 can't be causing the Earth to heat up.
quitwhendone · M
@usher What do you mean "lags?"
usher · 41-45, F
@quitwhendone Lags mean that the co2 rises after the Temperature rises. In other words the temp rises and then the co2 rises many years later. It's a scientific fact. what ever is causing the earth is heat up is not co2 but maybe another greenhouse gas.
Northwest · M
@usher
OMG. Please stop pretending this is science. This is gibberish. Not everyone is a scientist, but when people use gibberish to inform their political decisions, it's really fucked up.
Lags mean that the co2 rises after the Temperature rises. In other words the temp rises and then the co2 rises many years later. It's a scientific fact. what ever is causing the earth is heat up is not co2 but maybe another greenhouse gas.
OMG. Please stop pretending this is science. This is gibberish. Not everyone is a scientist, but when people use gibberish to inform their political decisions, it's really fucked up.
Northwest · M
@Oster1
You're trying to pretend that photosynthesis is what we're discussing here. We're not, but I don't believe you understand the difference, but in your mind, this is what it's about. It's not.
I mean, please. This argument is a very mute point. You are so correct and always will be!😊
You're trying to pretend that photosynthesis is what we're discussing here. We're not, but I don't believe you understand the difference, but in your mind, this is what it's about. It's not.
1-25 of 67