This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
My guess is Canada would just be alot bigger.
This message was deleted by its author.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@MarmeeMarch Doubtful because the size of British North America would not have changed the end result of the collapse of the British Empire.
jackjjackson · 70-79, M
I’d say like Canada. They wouldn’t want the weak DNA of Canadians to infest Americans. @PicturesOfABetterTomorrow
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@jackjjackson Congrats. You can't even string a coherent sentence together here.
This message was deleted by its author.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@MarmeeMarch Why? It was British North America from the 1700s and was referred as such for 100 years. The British Mandate of India included India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan. They didn't rename it as it included more and more territory.
This message was deleted by its author.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@MarmeeMarch Eventually yes. But if the 13 colonies lost there is no reason why the name of the territory would have changed at the time.