What would your response be if...

... SW administrators started tagging posts with fact-check labels?

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

WalksWith · 51-55, F

Relieved. Way too many lies and inaccuracies.

SW-User

That would be incredibly stupid and unnecessary. I don’t need a label to know what’s BS on here. 🤷‍♂️

InkBot · 36-40, M

@SW-User I can think of several who need it.

SW-User

@InkBot IstillmissEP would be out of work. Lol

InkBot · 36-40, M

@SW-User "MY FREE SPEECH IS BEING VIOLATED!"

SubstantialKick · 31-35, M

All of the political conspiracy theorists would look stupid...oh wait, they already do 🤷‍♂️.

InkBot · 36-40, M

@SubstantialKick They would accuse SW of being A) forcing a liberal bias, and B) violating their free speech.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

luckranger71 · 51-55, M

@LvChris Fact. About 50% of the US users here appear to be of Fox/OANN/Breitbart/Trump twitter echo chamber.

InkBot · 36-40, M

@LvChris God forbid one of those advertisements with half naked women pulls out.

Add a comment...