Top | Newest First | Oldest First
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
Consider we can't even get these fools to wear a body cam when they are shooting people I don't see any sign whatsoever that they should be trusted with people's data. They can already find out if a phone was used during that time by contacting the provider and asking a simple yes or no question. If anything police consistently prove they cannot be trusted with anything more then that.
REMsleep · 41-45, F
Maybe with a search warrant depending on severity of accident/potential criminal accountability.
In most cases for basic traffic accidents checking the phone isn't needed.
It is often clear who is at fault and it dosent matter if they were picking their nose or texting. They are in the wrong.
So my basic response is No
In most cases for basic traffic accidents checking the phone isn't needed.
It is often clear who is at fault and it dosent matter if they were picking their nose or texting. They are in the wrong.
So my basic response is No
View 2 more replies »
REMsleep · 41-45, F
@Pikachu I mean as long as it can legally be refused I guess I don't have any major problem with it but at the end of the day any technology that accesses your device to mine data has the ability to detail other info also turning over my phone to " the police" for a potential detail free search means that I have confidence in the officers to be trustand I personally don't
BlueVeins · 22-25
Yes, but only if it's not on a discretionary basis.
SW-User
I hate the thought of my rights being violated yet, I don't text and drive. And, if I was in an accident with someone who did text and drive, I'd want the police to be able to put it on the incident report. A person should be held accountable with cell phone misuse as they are with DUIs. I suspect the laws will eventually be changed to cover cellphones the way alcohol is covered. People can say no to a check but, then, their conduct comes into question.
@SW-User
Well i can understand that. But it's not very comfortable being asked to blow into a breathalyzer either lol
Well i can understand that. But it's not very comfortable being asked to blow into a breathalyzer either lol
SW-User
@Pikachu lol. Exactly my point actually. Anything they ask me to do, I'd be anxious about. Being pulled over would make me anxious. I think it has to do with loss of control.
@SW-User
Yeah i think most of us are a little nervous in any interaction with the police.
Yeah i think most of us are a little nervous in any interaction with the police.
CestManan · 46-50, F
Cell phone records can be pulled later, it is not the pigs job to rummage through somebody cell phone.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Sharon Studies have shown hands-free phone use to be every bit as dangerous as holding the unit. It's a brain thing, not a dexterity thing.
And as long as it's only metadata with no details, what matter who's phone it is? You can be caught 9 times on camera within the space of a city block - knowing whether a phone was in use is hardly a violation, especially if there's a law against phone use and driving.
And as long as it's only metadata with no details, what matter who's phone it is? You can be caught 9 times on camera within the space of a city block - knowing whether a phone was in use is hardly a violation, especially if there's a law against phone use and driving.
IMO
That would require a search warrant.
No different than a LEO asking to "Search your car" during a routine traffic stop.
As I have explained... "I have nothing to hide but my civil rights and nothing to do today so I don't mind waiting on your dog."
That would require a search warrant.
No different than a LEO asking to "Search your car" during a routine traffic stop.
As I have explained... "I have nothing to hide but my civil rights and nothing to do today so I don't mind waiting on your dog."
beckyromero · 36-40, F
No. Leave that up to the Courts.
If there's a lawsuit, records can always be subpoenaed from the cell phone company to see if the person was on a phone call at the time of the accident.
If there's a lawsuit, records can always be subpoenaed from the cell phone company to see if the person was on a phone call at the time of the accident.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
They will anyway.
Have done in the UK for a long time.
Have done in the UK for a long time.
@Picklebobble2
Yeah i actually have no idea what the laws around this are in various places. I know i heard about the concept on the radio a couple years ago.
Yeah i actually have no idea what the laws around this are in various places. I know i heard about the concept on the radio a couple years ago.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
@Pikachu Insurance companies will start insisting on it. Especially now you have this new breed of moron out there who get into accidents deliberately with the intention of massively over-estimating repair costs to the other party's insurers !
DudeistPriest · M
That's a small price to pay if a person's life is in danger.
adorbz · 26-30, F
I think yes but tbh I am not really sure
Powderflask · 31-35, M
No. I don't consent to any police activity involving my property.